Affichage des articles dont le libellé est succession. Afficher tous les articles
Affichage des articles dont le libellé est succession. Afficher tous les articles

Une succession rondement menée


Les instances dirigeantes de la SRCM ont fait preuve de diligence. En moins de 4 jours, la succession de Chari est définitivement réglée. La crainte d’une répétition de 1983 était dans tous les esprits. Voilà donc tous les abhyasis rassurés, l’avenir est assuré.

Chronique de 4 jours bien remplis :
-     -  Parthasarathi Rajagopalachari, 87 ans, s’éteint samedi 20 décembre à 21 h 45
-     -  Il envoie un message à la médium le lendemain matin à 10 h
-     -   Sa dépouille est incinérée lundi 22 décembre à 15 h et le Working Committee se réunit
-   - Mardi 23 décembre, Kamlesh Patel fait son premier discours de président (Fulfil His Mission), après lecture du relevé de décisions du Working Committee par US Bajpai, secrétaire général de la SRCM

Kamlesh Desaibhai Patel succède donc à Chari comme président de la SRCM et représentant spirituel du Sahaj marg, 4ème maître après Lalaji, Babuji et Chari selon la légende officielle en cours (rappelons pour l’histoire que Lalaji n’a jamais été le maître de la SRCM ou du Sahaj marg).
Voilà donc théoriquement tous les abhyasis rassurés, l’avenir de la Mission est soi-disant assuré.

Et Patel appelle aussitôt à l’harmonie et à l’unité, en déplorant que ceux qui recherchent Dieu soient plus attirés par la renommée que les bandits et autres mafieux, et qu’il existe plus de différences et moins d’unité au sein de la Mission que chez ces gens là…
Comme si cela ne suffisait pas, Patel revient sur l’image d’ami et courtisan des riches qui a selon lui collé à la peau de Chari tout au long de sa vie. Il rappelle ce fait pour mieux le démentir ? Ou bien pour commencer un droit/devoir d’inventaire ?
Voilà donc théoriquement tous les abhyasis rassurés, l’avenir de la Mission est soi-disant assuré.

Et les messages du Monde lumineux tombent chaque jour en français et en anglais, rendus publics au plus tard dans les 24 heures. Après le premier message de « l’étape finale » dicté par Chari à la médium, Babuji a complètement repris son rôle. Patel n’aura qu’à bien suivre ce qu’on lui dicte de faire depuis le Monde lumineux.
Ainsi le 26 décembre :« (…) Il [Chari] envisageait des aménagements pour faciliter certains aspects de la pratique ; tout doit être fait dans ce sens, nous y reviendrons bientôt (…) ». Puis le 27 : « (…) Des changements se produiront dans la Mission : de nouvelles règles seront instituées pour favoriser son expansion et les moyens d’action au plan matériel, prioritairement pour le Maître incarné et pour les nombreux serviteurs investis à tous les niveaux. Notre cher Kamlesh en décidera, il fera au mieux pour satisfaire pleinement aux nécessités de la pratique et des besoins incessants de l’ensemble des abhyasis ; nous y reviendrons. (…) ». Et le 28 : « (…) Bien des décisions seront à prendre ; il [Patel] sera sans cesse guidé et éclairé au mieux sur ce qu’il convient de faire. (…) »
Qui donc pilote la Mission ? Patel le 4ème maître ou bien la médium ? Babuji et Chari depuis le Monde lumineux ? Tout cela reste à clarifier… mais Patel pourrait bien n’être qu’une marionnette entre d’autres mains beaucoup plus puissantes mais restant cachées dans l’ombre.
Voilà donc théoriquement tous les abhyasis rassurés, l’avenir de la Mission est soi-disant assuré.

Et pourtant les abhyasis avouent chaque jour à quel point Patel est demeuré un inconnu pour eux. Les abhyasis groupies fanatiques de leur star avaient choisi Chari, image rassurante d’un Père protecteur et charismatique. Patel le patibulaire saura-t-il les convaincre de rester ?


Voilà donc théoriquement tous les abhyasis rassurés, l’avenir de la Mission est soi-disant assuré. Tout autant que le cauchemar de Chari qui voyait éclater la Mission…


Post scriptum :

Anonyme a dit… 
Voilà une vision très optimistique des choses. Depuis quand vous fiez vous à ce que la Sriram publie pour dire que la succession se passe bien ? Vous nous avez habitués à plus d’objectivité. Qui vous dit que le Working Committee dans son ensemble approuve la nomination de Patibulaire Patel ? Sahaj Sandesh et les Whispers sont la voix officielle de la Sriram, mais que disent les voix off the record ?
Vous vous rappelez 1984 quand le secrétaire général S.A. Sarnad soutenait un jour Umesh Chandra Saxena puis le lendemain prenait fait et cause pour Chari…
S’il y a des dissensions, des divergences au sein de l’establishment, ce n’est pas sur leur site internet qu’on l’apprendra. N’importe où mais pas là…
Alors ne dites pas que tout s’est bien passé ! En apparence oui, et c’est bien ce qu’ils voulaient nous faire croire. Leur campagne de com s’est parfaitement déroulée : la preuve, vous avez tout gobé. En réalité, on n’en a pas la moindre idée, on ne sait rien…

Alexis @ Anonyme pessimistic 
Mea culpa ! Tu as raison, j’ai succombé à la campagne de com de la SRCM… parfaitement orchestrée d’ailleurs ! 
Ce n’est pas dans mes habitudes, mais là j’ai marché et avalé tous leurs éléments de langage. Mais il y a peut-être une raison plus profonde à tout ça : Chari avant sa mort avait tout organisé dans les moindres détails pour que sa succession se déroule sans histoires. C’est probablement le syndrome du choc qu’il avait eu en 1983-84… 
Voilà pourquoi je suis tenté d’accepter le discours officiel. Reste que tu as parfaitement raison, si l’un des membres de l’establishment s’oppose aux décisions, nous ne l’apprendrons que plus tard et par d’autres canaux, si même nous en entendons parler (ce qui est loin d’être certain). 
Pour l’instant, même si la Mission joue la transparence en publiant tout, le principal porte-parole est la médium et ses whispers…
  

Pourquoi Patel est condamné à l’échec



Il est loin le temps des spiritualités orientales vulgarisées par Râmakrishna et Vivekananda où le maître spirituel accompagnait son disciple dans un long cheminement intérieur, telle l’image d’Epinal véhiculée par les bonzes bouddhistes et leurs élèves.
Le besoin occidental de ré enchanter un monde devenu trop matérialiste, son attrait pour les spiritualités orientales et sa synthèse new age ont permis la genèse et le développement de vastes mouvements spirituels internationaux hyper médiatisés.
Victimes de leur succès, les spiritualités orientales n’ont pas pu résister sans renoncements au matérialisme, au gigantisme et à la médiatisation, conséquences directes de la mondialisation du marché spirituel. Elles y ont perdu tout ou partie de leur âme.

Voici venu le temps des leaders spirituels charismatiques
Aujourd’hui, les chercheurs spirituels veulent trouver un maître vivant à idéaliser, une idole. Ils sont en quête d’un chef spirituel qui soit un leader charismatique, une star digne de ses fans.
Pour exister aux yeux du monde, le leader spirituel doit écraser la concurrence. Comme tout être humain au contact de la tentation, il ne peut résister aux attraits du pouvoir : l’influence et l’argent.
Il n’y a donc plus aucune place pour la relation privilégiée maître disciple spirituel dans le monde actuel. Le modèle s’est transformé au fil du temps en une relation entre un chef spirituel et son troupeau d’adeptes fanatisés au sein d’un mouvement spiritualiste internationalisé.

Les maîtres du Sahaj marg à l’épreuve de ces évolutions
Lalaji représente bien le temps disparu de la relation maître disciple, Babuji a traversé avec plus ou moins de bonheur la période de globalisation et de mutation spirituelle, Chari est un très bon exemple de ces nouveaux leaders spiritualistes.
Très conscient de ces évolutions, c’est Chari qui entraîne Babuji en Occident au milieu des années 70 vers ce nouveau public assoiffé d’ésotérisme oriental. A la mort de Babuji, rejeté violemment par les seniors précepteurs indiens, Chari part à la conquête du vaste marché spirituel occidental presque encore vierge. Fort de son succès, Chari revient en Inde 10 ans plus tard avec argent et fidèles, écrasant toute opposition où qu’elle se trouve. Chari est un gourou charismatique mais autoritaire.
Il ne faut pas s’y tromper, le public de Chari n’est plus celui de Babuji. Terminées les traditions spirituelles d’origine hindouiste, Chari s’adresse aux Occidentaux, à la diaspora indienne ainsi qu’aux classes montantes et embourgeoisées indiennes.
De la méthode spirituelle de Babuji, seuls les bienfaits de la méditation perdurent, tout le reste a disparu. Mais le pouvoir charismatique de Chari, l’égrégore qui résulte de son attractivité sur la foule de ses adeptes et la géniale invention des murmures de Whispers ont remplacé la magie et le mystère disparus.

L’impossible héritage
Le pouvoir fédérateur de l’égrégore existe grâce à Chari. A sa mort, il ne restera plus rien que le bienfait des méditations. Mais tout le monde médite partout, il n’y a pas de monopole du Sahaj marg sur la méditation. Quelle mystique Patel pourra-t-il proposer ?
Bien que légitimé par Chari et les grands saints de Whispers, Patel n’emporte pas l’adhésion des fans de Chari. Second choix de Chari après Ajay Kumar Bhatter, Patel reste l’éternel second dans l’ombre de la Star.
Quand Chari était vilipendé en Inde, il est allé chercher le succès sur de nouvelles terres vierges. Quel public Patel pourra-t-il mobiliser ? Il n’y a plus d’espace à défricher, il est condamné à obtenir les faveurs des dévots de Chari. Mais qu’a-t-il donc à leur offrir ?
Surfer sur la mémoire du passé et de Chari est insuffisant et accessible à tous ses opposants. Que peut-il offrir de plus ?

Dans le monde des Whispers, le Sahaj marg va se développer et Patel en sera le prochain leader incontesté. Mais dans le monde réel, les choses ne sont pas aussi simples. Même Chari avoue qu’il faudra nouer des alliances avec les autres mouvements spiritualistes pour faire avancer la Cause…
  

Kamlesh DesaiBhay Patel, nouveau représentant spirituel du Sahaj marg ?



Qui est-il ? Que fait-il ? 

Le Portrait de Kamlesh Patel se précise. Il est né le 28 septembre 1956 dans le Gujarat, un état de l'Ouest de l'Inde frontalier du Pakistan. Emigré aux Etats-Unis dans l’Etat de New York après des études de pharmacie à Ahmedabad il y a plus de 35 ans, il a vécu à Staten Island avec sa femme Pratima K. Patel jusqu'en 2011. Ils ont deux enfants, Akhilesh et Sahat (Sahaj ?), qui atteignent maintenant une petite trentaine.

Patel le pharmacien de Brooklyn n’est pas un petit pharmacien de quartier. Dans les faits, il contrôle d’une façon ou d’une autre de nombreuses pharmacies, principalement à Brooklyn : Marg Pharmacy Inc, CareWell Pharmacy Inc, LindenWood Rx Center Inc, WoodHull Prescription Rx Center, Slope Drugs & Surgical Supply, etc. Il est aussi associé financièrement à Santosh Khanjee dans une chaîne hôtelière et, avec sa femme, à la tête de la "Kamlesh & Pratima Patel Foundation" depuis mai 2011; En Inde, il a créé la Prime Time Share ResortsPvt Ltd en avril 97 avec sa femme, puis s'est associé à Jyoti Patel en novembre 2010 dans la Dr Mittal Laboratories Pvt ltd à Dehradun (www.drmittallabs.in).

A presque 20 ans, Patel est devenu abhyasi en août 1976. Il avait 26 ans à la mort de Babuji. L’a-t-il connu personnellement ? Tout comme sa femme, il est précepteur depuis presque aussi longtemps. C’est un cacique du Sahaj marg, passé par toutes les fonctions de responsabilité (zone-in-charge, region-in-charge, etc.), jusqu’aux postes de directeur de la Fondation américaine SMSF, grand médiateur de la nouvelle Equipe de Service mondial de la SRCM, successeur de Chari le 26 juillet 2011 en remplacement du démissionnaire Ajay Kumar Bhatter, vice-président plénipotentiaire depuis le Bhandara spécial du 15 août 2012, et enfin représentant spirituel du Sahaj marg et président de la SRCM au lendemain de la mort de Chari le 20 décembre 2014.

Ce second choix de Chari, aujourd'hui proclamé "perfect blend of Eastern heart and Western mind", a chèrement payé son poste. Via ses pharmacies, sa famille ou en son nom propre, Patel a effectué de très grosses donations à la Mission. Entre 2006 et 2012, il a versé plus de 2 millions de dollars, s’érigeant ainsi comme 4ème donateur étranger dans la liste des argentiers de la Mission. Ses versements se sont raréfiés en 2013...


Représentant spirituel, vraiment ?

Une légitimité s’acquière, elle ne se décrète pas.

Les abhyasis avouent chaque jour à quel point Patel est demeuré un inconnu pour eux. Groupies fanatiques de leur star, les abhyasis avaient choisi Chari, image rassurante d’un Père protecteur et charismatique. Patel le patibulaire saura-t-il les convaincre de rester ?

Bien que légitimé par Chari et les grands saints de Whispers, Patel n’emporte pas l’adhésion des fans de Chari. Second choix de Chari après Ajay Kumar Bhatter, Patel reste l’éternel second dans l’ombre de la Star. Le pouvoir fédérateur de l’égrégore existait grâce à Chari. Quelle mystique Patel pourra-t-il proposer ? Quand Chari était vilipendé en Inde, il est allé chercher le succès sur de nouvelles terres vierges. Quel public Patel pourra-t-il mobiliser ? Il n’y a plus d’espace à défricher, il est condamné à obtenir les faveurs des dévots de Chari. Mais qu’a-t-il donc à leur offrir ? Surfer sur la mémoire du passé et de Chari est insuffisant et accessible à tous ses opposants. Que peut-il offrir de plus ?

Tout est en ordre aujourd’hui, comme tout était en ordre il y a un peu plus de 30 ans quand Babuji décédait. Et sa succession fut simple et limpide : une guerre acharnée opposant les enfants de Babuji à Chari, sans parler des multiples scissions annexes. Il n’a fallu qu’une quinzaine d’années pour que Chari finisse par s’imposer à la tête du mouvement. Cela n’aurait pas été possible sans le soutien des abhyasis étrangers et il n’a jamais réussir à éradiquer toutes les velléités séparatistes…

Aujourd’hui, personne ne s’oppose à Kamlesh Patel. Le fils de Chari PR Krishna, comme ses petits-enfants Barghav et Madhuri Krishna, abandonnent volontiers leur fortune et leur pouvoir d’influence au pharmacien de Brooklyn. De même pour les soutiers de Chari qui ont trimé tant d’années et qui ne bénéficieront d’aucune reconnaissance : AP Durai, US Bajpai, Santosh Khanjee et tous les autres lieutenants de Chari. De même pour les grands argentiers de la Mission, tels Madhava Reddy ou Ilya Kazmaly, qui voient leurs investissements disparaître. Personne ne s’oppose au pharmacien de Brooklyn, pas même les petits-enfants de Babuji, tels Navneet Kumar Saxena ou Sharad Chandra Saxena ! Pas même les successeurs de Kasturi ou de Lalaji…

A tel point que Chari était pleinement rassuré sur l’avenir de la Mission. Ainsi en 2009, il déclarait qu'un cancer ronge le Sahaj marg de l'intérieur et que son organisation est menacée de désintégration. Dans ses cauchemars, il voyait la Mission se scinder en 240 petits groupes (The need for personal discipline, discours du 10 janvier 2009 aux ZIC à Manappakkam).

Patel aura-t-il les épaules assez solides pour savoir s’imposer face à tous ses concurrents et maintenir l’unité du Sahaj marg et de la Mission ? Il pourrait bien n’être qu’une marionnette entre d’autres mains beaucoup plus puissantes mais restant cachées dans l’ombre. Un homme sous influences.

Depuis la mort de Chari, les messages whispers sont maintenant diffusés presque aussitôt que Babuji les a (aurait) dictés depuis l’Au-delà. Babuji et Chari s’adresse(raie)nt maintenant en temps réel aux abhyasis, autant sinon plus que l’actuel président de la Mission Patel. Alors la question devient : Qui dirige réellement la Mission aujourd’hui ? Patel ou Chari et Babuji depuis l’Au-delà ? Les médiums ou Patel ?


Poser la question c’est comme y répondre…

Les successeurs de Chari

Le 29 avril 2005, Rajagopalachari écrit une première lettre de nomination de son successeur, Ajay Kumar Bhatter, jeune homme d'affaires du Bengale occidental et membre du Comité exécutif du président depuis 2003, choisi par Babuji et confirmé par la hiérarchie du Sahaj Marg, signature ratifiée par seize autres personnalités. Et il annonce publiquement sa nomination le lendemain, à l'occasion des soixante ans de la Mission et le jour même du 106ème anniversaire de la naissance de Babuji, dans un discours intitulé "Securing the Future of the Mission", alors qu'il va sur ses 78 ans. AK Bhatter a été choisi par Babuji, il est entraîné à cela depuis des années et le sera encore durant toute la vie de Rajagopalachari. Il lui succèdera donc comme représentant spirituel de Babuji et président de la Mission partout dans le monde. Mais AK Bhatter jette l’éponge 5 ans plus tard, usé par la cogestion avec Chari, les manœuvres et manipulations de toutes sortes. Chari annonce sa démission le 2 mai 2010.
Six ans après avoir nommé son premier successeur officiel, Rajagopalachari nomme donc un second successeur le 26 juillet 2011. Il désigne Kamlesh Desaibhai Patel, pharmacien à Brooklyn d’origine indienne, dans un document cosigné par US Bajpai, AK Bhatter et Sanjay Bhatia. L’annonce officielle n’a lieu que 2 mois plus tard, le 3 octobre 2011. Mais comme la première nomination, celle-ci a été approuvé par Babuji depuis l’au-delà, dans un message colporté par la médium à l’intention de Chari.
Né dans le Gujarat (Etat de l'Ouest de l'Inde, frontalier du Pakistan), Kamlesh a émigré aux USA il y a plus de 20 ans pour devenir pharmacien à Brooklyn (il aurait la cinquantaine). Suite à sa nomination par Chari, il s’est installé à Garden of Hearts (Chennai), face au Babuji Memorial Ashram. C’est un cacique, abhyasi de la première heure, précepteur depuis presque aussi longtemps, passé par toutes les fonctions de responsabilité (zone-in-charge, region-in-charge, etc.), jusqu’aux postes de directeur de la fondation américaine SMSF et grand médiateur de la nouvelle Equipe de Service mondial de la SRCM.
Cet indien d’origine vit à Staten Island aux Etats-Unis, dans l’état de New York. Un Indo-américain à la tête de la SRCM, c’est nouveau. S’il succède véritablement à Chari – à l’inverse d’Ajay – choisira-t-il les USA ou bien s’installera-t-il définitivement en Inde ?

Une légitimité s'acquière, elle ne se décrète pas
Ces 2 nominations visaient un double objectif : mettre un terme aux querelles de succession et rassurer les abhyasis quant à leur avenir. Mais il ne faut pas se leurrer, ces annonces officielles n’ont jamais réussi à éteindre complètement les hostilités entre les différents prétendants à la succession, elles ne font que les mettre en sourdine à défaut de les étouffer. Déjà, les abhyasis ne succombent pas tous au charisme des successeurs désignés. Cela ne va pas sans grimaces et grincements de dents. Mais il faut bien accepter la volonté du gourou, et donc faire avec…
Chari n'a nommé ses successeurs que pour mieux calmer les multiples prétendants à sa succession, mais ce ne sont que des pantins. Leur légitimité s'éteindra d'elle-même à la mort de Rajagopalachari. Une légitimité s'acquière, elle ne se décrète pas. Les enjeux sont considérablement plus grands qu’à la mort de Babuji.
Dans cette course à la succession, son fils PR Krishna, le richissime héritier et grand argentier de la Shri Ram Chandra Mission, qui gère les biens fonciers et immobiliers de la Mission, tout comme son petit-fils Barghav et sa petite-fille Madhuri sont bien placés. Santosh Khanjee, l'éminence grise qui connaît tous ses secrets et qui tient d'une main de fer toute l'organisation et les fondations a aussi ses chances. Mais ses hommes de main souvent à l'avant-garde des prises en force d'ashrams et de tous les coups tordus, tels Uma Shankar Bajpai et Arokiasamy P Durai (retraité des forces de police), s’agitent aussi.
Sans parler de la médium de Babuji (Catherine Lauret ?), qui avait prédit qu’Ajay Kumar Bhatter ne succèderait pas à Chari, à peine six mois avant sa démission. Pour une entrée en scène, c’était parfaitement orchestré, une réussite totale. Mais attention, son prestige pourrait être de courte durée. C’est une femme et Chari a toujours dit qu’une femme ne pouvait pas devenir gourou.
Du côté des outsiders, les petits-enfants de Lalaji et Babuji, Dinesh et Navneet, voient là une opportunité de reprendre des rênes qui leur avaient échappées. Mais la récente exposition médiatique du fils du Docteur Varadachari, KC Narayana, laisse supposer qu'il entend bien tirer son épingle du jeu. Et si Kasturi reste toujours en dehors des jeux de pouvoir, il n'en va peut-être pas de même de ses collaborateurs. Et qu'en est-il de Srinivasa Rao à la tête de la Shri Ram Chandraji Maharaj Seva Trust à Cuddapah ?
Et en 2011, un autre petit-fils e Babuji, Sharad Chandra, crée la Society for Babuji’s Mission, parce qu’il considère que la SRCM devenue trop imortante a relégué au second plan les aspects spirituels du Sahaj Marg…

D'ailleurs Rajagopalachari lui-même s'en inquiète et le révèle en janvier 2009. Il déclare qu'un cancer ronge le Sahaj Marg de l'intérieur et que son organisation est menacée de désintégration. Il fait des cauchemars où il voit la Shri Ram Chandra Mission se désintégrer en 240 petites missions.

Liens :
Kamlesh Patel, un successeur plénipotentiaire ?
- Chari, ou l’industrialisation d’une spiritualité à l’Occidentale

Procès-verbaux du Comité de travail et de l’AG de la SRCM de février 84


Les minutes du Comité de travail de la SRCM des 6 et 7 février 1984
(fautes typographiques comprises)

Minutes of the working committee meeting held on 6th and 7th February 1984 (Sunday and Monday) at 10 AM at Shahjahanpur.

The following members of the committee were present.
1. Shri PC Chaturvedi
2. Shri PC Saxena
3. Shri BM Heble
4. Shri R Rajagopalachari
5. Shri RL Mimani
6. Shri KV Subba Rao
7. Shri VR Vipat
8. Dr SP Srivastava
9. Shri KC Narayana

Ex-officio Members
1. Shri SA Sarnad, Secretary
2. Shri Kashi Ram Agarwal, Joint Secretary
3. Shri JRK Raizada, Secretary to president
4. Shri Rajeshwar Prasad Mathur, Zonal Secretary
5. Shri Dunderao Nagnoor, “ “
6. Shri Kanti Bhai V Patel “ “
7. Shri Ramapati Dinger “ “
8. Shri Raghubir Prasad Agarwal, Acting Zonal Secretary

BY SPECIAL INVITATION
1. Shri Sarvesh Chandra Saxena
2. Shri Jalbhai Cassad
3. Khoosalbhai K Patel
4. Shri SC Kishore
5. Shri Ram Gopal Verma
6. Shri Sushil Kumar
7. Shri RS Giri
8. Shri Nasib Chand
9. Shri KK Srivastava

ITEM NUMBER ONE OF THE AGENDA
Mr PC Chadurvedi being senior member requested the members of the working committee to propose the name of the Chairman who should conduct the proceedings of the meeting.

RESOLUTION
a) Shri S.A. Sarnad proposed and insisted that Shri P.C. Chadurvedi should be requested to chair the meeting being the senior member of the working committee and a close associate of our Revered Master, Shri Ram Chandra ji Maharaj. And Shri K.V. Subbarao seconded the proposal. The rest member of the house honoured the same. Shri P.C. Chadurvedi occupied the chair and conducted the proceedings of the meeting.
b) The chairman of the meeting proposed that all the members of the working committee should take an oath before the Samadhi of Revered Master and the following oath was taken by all the members of the working committee ;
“We the member of the working committee solemnly affirm an oath before the Master that ; -
I. We all shall be working jointly for the Mission and abide by the desire of the Master.
II. The desire of the Master shall be honoured in every matter and in all respects.
III. We shall endeavour to create a feeling of brother hood and co.operation among the Abhyasis of the Mission.
IV. We will not involve ourselves in any type of activity that would be determental to the ideals of and aims of the Mission.
V. We shall always live for the Mission and the Master.
VI. We shall abide by the rules and consittution of Shri Ram Chandra Mission and follow the ten commandments of Sahaj Marg.
We pray for Thy continued Blessings to live upto Thy expectations.”

At the request of the special invities the Chairman of the meeting agreed to take the items as listed in the agenda from 1 to 8. First immediately after the confirmation of the meeting of the working committee held on 10th July 1983.
The Chairman requested the committee members to takeup the items of the agenda one by one and decide the issue before us regarding the President of Shri Ram Chandra Mission.

RESOLUTION NO.1*
Mr. S.A. Sarnad Secretary of SRCM read the minutes of the meeting dated 10-7-1983 in details and members concerned had big objection on the sealed cover given by Shri Sharad Saxena for declaring as bogus and forge and also the claims of Shri P. Rajagopala chari vide his alleged nomination letter dated 23.3.74 x said to have been executed by Shri Ram Chandra Ji Maharaj and letter dated 19.3.1974 furnished by Shri P. Raja Gopala Chari along with the photocopy cover of the x envelope has to be re-discussed after the discussions of the items of the agenda., and this was the opinion of the all the members present in the meeting. The Chairman asserted and announced that the members will be given the opportunities to discuss on the above said two letters produced in the form of photocopies cannot be taken as authentic unless the originals are produced.
The rest of the minutes as read by Shri S.A. Sarnad were confirmed and adopted. Resolved that the minutes of the meeting dated 10.7.83 were read confirmed and adopted subject to the uscertvue opinion of Chairman Shri. P.C. Chadurvedi regarding the alleged nomination dated 23.3.74 and a covering letter dated 19.3.74 which are to be examined and the opinion of the members to be obtained accordingly

2. Shri S.A. Sarnad produced before the working committee a letter dated 5.5.1983 and 22.8.1983 of Shri Umesh Chandra Saxena alongwith the nomination letter dated 16.4.1982 before the members of the working committee. The members present examined the documents including the declaration/nomination letter dt. 16.4.1982 made by Shri Ram Chandra Ji, Founder President Shri Ram Chandra Mission in favour of Shri Umesh Chandra Saxena and found the same as genuine. Mr. Umesh Chandra Saxena who was present in the meeting on request also showed the originals of the declaration/nomination letter dated 16.4.1982 including the letter dated 5.5.1983 and 22.8.1983. before the Chairman and later on to all members present in the meeting. Mr. P.C. Chadurvedi examined the documents with reference to the registered constitution and rules and by-laws of Shri Ram Chandra Mission and gave the opinion that the nomination of Shri Umesh Chandra Saxena is validly held and is as per the rule 3(b)of the rules and constitution of Shri Ram Chandra Mission.
Under the circumsatances the members present accepted the document and the following resolution was passed.
RESOLVED THAT SHRI UMESH CHANDRA SAXENA IS AND BE HEREBY ACCEPTED AND APPROVED AS THE PRESIDENT OF SHRI RAM CHANDRA MISSION IN VIEW OF THE NOMINATION/DECLARATION DATED 16.4.1982 MADE BY SHRI RAM CHANDRAJI, THE FOUNDER PRESIDENT OF SHRI RAM CHANDRA MISSION UNDER RULE 3(b) OF THE RULES AND CONSTITUTION OF OF SHRI RAM CHANDRA MISSION.”
IT WAS FURTHER RESOLVED THAT Shri Umesh Chandra Saxena, President Shri Ram Chandra mission shall enjoy all the powers as vested with the Founder President under the rules and constitution of Shri Ram Chandra Mission”.
RESOLVED FURTHER THAT “Shri Umesh Chandra Saxena is and be hereby requested to form and appoint fresh members of the working committee or adopt the members already in the list of working committee appointed by the Founder at His own discretion”.

3. Mr. S.A. Sarnad informed the members that the notice was given will in advance to Shri P. Rajagopala chari for attending the working committee meeting and to bring the original papers of nomination letter (alleged) said to have been executed by Shri Ram Chandra Ji, the Founder President of Shri Ram Chandra Mission letter dated 23.3.1974 and 19.3.74. But, to our surprise neither he has attended the meeting nor he has brought the originals nor sent the originals through his brother and hence his claim in view of these circumstances is recommended to be rejected or cancelled but requested the member to give one more chance for amicable settlement and was further suggested that goodwill committee be formed to pursuate Shri P. Rajagopalachari for amicable settlement inorder to keep the solidarity in the Mission and to create a feeling of brotherhood and co-operation among the abhyasis of the Mission. However, this was further pointed out that inview of the latest nomination dated 16.4.1982 there is no need to go and consider this nomination (alleged) letter dated 23.3.1974. and it will be rightful attempt on the part of committee members for not to go inquestion of appointing a President and this dispute is settled and superceded the claim of Shri P. Rajagopalachari. In view of the above following resolution was passed ;
RESOLVED THAT “The claim of Shri P. Rajagopalachari vide his alleged nomination dated 23.3.1974 stands rejected/withdrawn”.

4. Shri S.A. Sarnad produced before the members a copy of the registered will dated 30.12.1976 and read the same before the members present. He also exclaimed that the registered will clearly states that our Revered Master Shri Ram Chandra Ji Maharaj was having a doubt of the lost papers may not be used in future by the person who has stolen it. for making it as a nomination or will in his favour and the members of the house now suspects that the alleged nomination dated 23.3.1974 and a covering letter 19.3.1974 is the result from those lost papers, said to have been said in the registered will dated 30.12.1976 in view of the declaration/nomination letter dated 16.4.1982. Mr. P.C. Chadurvedi during observation and the circumstances of the case was of the opinion that the alleged nomination dated 23.3.74 and covering letter dated 19.3.74 is the result of forgery. Since the incidents explained in the letter dated 19.3.1974 and especially clarifies a doubt from the second para of the letter.
“I have issued a certificate which I am sending with this letter. Preserve this certificate as valuable document.”
It can be very well imagined that the nomination which is [illisible] to have been issued on 23rd March, 1974 how can this be sent with the covering letter 19.3.74”.
And further that as it is asserted in the letter in the first para of 19.3.74 that Mr. and Mrs. Don is doing excellent service, thanks to them”.
Mr. Umesh Chandra Saxena showed me a letter dated 9.4.1975 in which it is stated that Mr. and Mrs. Don were in India during second week of April and left for Canada on 17th April, 1975, who has been doing his nursing” With this proof, it is evident that there is something fishy of the claim of Shri. P. Rajagopalachari
RESOLVED THAT “Shri Umesh Chandra Saxena President Shri Ram Chandra Mission be and is hereby requested to form a new working committee with the help of Shri P.C. Chadurvedi, Senior member and to make the via media arrangement for the appointment of the Chairman of the working committee till the atmosphere/undertainity is made under control amicably by interference of the senior members and bringing Mr. P. Rajagopalachari to some understanding so that the split in the Mission is avoided.”
In view of the above, a good-will committee was suggested to the President and the suggestion given by the member was well accepted

6. Mr. Umesh Chandra Saxena was requested to handover the photocopy of the letter dated 5.5.1983 and 22.8.1983 alongwith the declaration/nomination dated 16.4.1982 to Shri S.A. Sarnad who inturn will inform the acceptance of the declaration/nomination of Shri. Umesh Chandra Saxena to all the members/preceptors/abhyasis/organisers regarding such nomination.

7. Mr. S.A. Sarnad was requested by the house to send the copy of the resolution and the minutes of the meeting is being held on 6th February and 7th February, 1984 to all its centres/preceptors/abhyasis the relevatn government authorities including assistant registrar Firms/Societies and Chits Baraily for making necessary change in records of Shri Ram Chandra Mission and to add the work Successor President in place after Founder President.
All Banks, Post Offices, Income Tax Department, Foreign exchange Department, Local Administration, Police Administration etc. be also be informed accordingly.

8. RESIGNATION OF SHRI KASHI RAM AGGARWAL
Mr. Kashi Ram Aggarwal insisted that his resignation as Joint Secretary of the Mission was given in the meeting on 10.7.83 should be accepted and he is not interested to continue. Under the circumstances explained all the members present felt that the resignation of Shri. Kashi Ram Aggarwal should be accepted and the following resolution was passed.
“RESOLVED THAT the resignation of Shri Kashi Ram Aggarwal be and is hereby accepted and Mr. S.A. Sarnad be requested to inform all the person concerned accordingly”.

With the permission of the Chair the meeting was concluded.

Sri P.C. Chaturvedi
Chairman of the Meeting.

----------------------------------------------------
Les minutes de l’Assemblée générale de la SRCM le 8 février 1984
(fautes typographiques comprises)


MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE GENERAL BODY HELD ON 8th FEBRUARY,1984
(TUESDAY AT 3 PM AT THE ASHRAM PREMISES) AT SHAHJAHANPUR.

Mr. P.C. Chadurvedi was requested to occupy the chair as a Chairman of the Mission.
There were 982 members assembled in the Meditation Hall of the ashram premises where the Preceptors, Prefects, Organisers, abhyasis and Working Committee Members including the President Shri Umesh Chandra Saxena nominated vide nomination letter dt.16.4.82 made by Shri Ram Chandra Ji Maharaj, the Founder President of Shri Ram Chandra Mission were present.

1. Mr. S.A. Sarnad read before the General Body the minutes of the Working Committee held on 6th 7th February, 1984. The resolution passed therein was un-animously accepted and approved by the General Body. The General Body Members present in the meeting were greatly concerned about the unnecessary conflicts created by P. Raja Gopalachari which they consider were not in the interest of the Members/Abhyasis/Preceptors and was very much against the Aims and Objects of the Shri Ram Chandra Mission. During the courseof questioner Mr. P.C. Chadurvedi tried topecify the members and is requested to forgive Shri P. Rajagopalachari and assured the house that necessary steps are taken to amicably settle the issue, sothat the brotherhood feeling remains for brother Parthasarathy in your hearts.
RESOLVED THAT “The resolution passed from resolution number 1 to 8 are unanimously accepted, approved and adopted, by all the Members present”.

2. The minutes of the meeting held on 10.7.83 held on at Head Quarters, Shajahanpur was approved and accepted by the Members subject to the incorporation of resolution 1 of the Working Committee held on 6th 7th February, 1984.

3. The members present requested the Chairman to read the declaration/nomination letter dated 16.4.82 made by Shri Ram Chandra Founder President of Shri Ram Chandra Mission. And the same was done before the members which reads as follows:

Gram-Sahajmarg
Tele
Phone- 2667
Shri Ram Chandra Mission
Shahjahanpur (UP) 242001 India

Regd. A.D. Date16th.April.1982

DECLARATION/NOMINATION"

I, Ram Chandra, Founder President of Shri Ram Chandra Mission, Diwan jograj, Shahjahanpur in Exercise of my Power under Rule 3 and 4 of the Rules and constitution of my Private Trust/Society, on my free Will and Accord and upon the due consideration of the totality of the circumstances prevailing in my said Mission including wishes and blessing of the Almighty and that of my Samarth Guru Shri Ram Chandraji Maharaj of Fatehgarh, do hereby nominate my Spiritual Representative as also my son Shri Umesh Chandra Saxena as Successor President of Shri Ram Chandra Mission Shahjahanpur, with liberty to him, to further nominate his successor President of Shri Ram Chandra Mission with the condition that the person so nominated by him as his successor President of the said Mission must be his spiritual representatives in his direct line of succession.
I shall however continue as President of aforesaid Mission till my life time and this nomination shall come into play only after my death.
Previous nomination if any, made by me, shall stand superceeded and cancelled.
Affectionately yours
RAM CHANDRA"

The above letters of nomination dated 16.4.82 the members present greated and congratulated Shri Umesh Chandra Saxena and requested him to carry and fulfil the dreams of our Revered Master. Shri Ram Chandra Mission and Mr. Umesh Chandra conveyed his willingness and promised to go with the path shown by our Revered Master.
RESOLVED THAT Shri Umesh Chandra Saxena is and be hereby authorised to carry out the functions as President Shri Ram Chandra Mission as per the rules and constitution, Shri Ram Chandra Mission”.

4. RESOLVED THAT the claims of P. Rajagopalachari in terms of the alleged photocopy of the nomination letter dated 23.3.1974 and covering letter dated 19.3.74 in view of the registered will dt. 30.12.76 made by Shri Ram Chandra Ji is being rejected.”

5. The Members present were informed by P.C. Chadurvedi, the Chair man of the meeting that as per the rules and constitution of Shri Ram Chandra Mission the President can come under clause or rules 3(b) of the constitution of SRCM which is reproduced below.

3. Organisation:
(a) The Mission shall have its Headquarters at Shahjahanpur, in the state of Uttar Pradesh, India.
(b) It shall work under the sole guidance and control of the Founder or His Spiritual Representative in the direct line of succession, and he shall be the President of the Mission.
(c) The President may at his discretion, establish branch societies and training centres affiliated to the Headquarters of the Mission in all matters of organisation and control, at other places as well, to promote the cause of the Mission.

Hence under the circumstances the nomination dated 16.4.1982 made by Shri Ram Chandra Ji Maharaj, in favour of Shri Umesh Chandra Saxena is valid and held to be genuine and further informed the members that he is the President of the Mission from today. He further requested the members, Abhyasis, Preceptors/Organisers and Members of the Working Committee to co-operate in carrying out the functions as President of Shri Ram Chandra Mission as per the direction and instructions given by the Founder President Shri Ram Chandra Mission.

6. Mr. P.C. Chaturvedi informed the Abhyasis, Preceptors, Organisers, Working Committee Members and others that one year long confusion has been vanished today by the grace of our Divine Master and we hope with your continued help and cooperation everyone will load his own way towards the success[xxx] of the Mission and will cooperate in fulfilling the dreams of our Revered Master, for which the Mission was established for the Mankind and the world at large. It is further my earnest pray to our Revered Master to bless us all in carrying out his duty and responsibilities given to our shoulders to His satisfaction.
Let in pray, with joined hands to maintain the solidarity and [illisible] feeling among the abhyasis of Shri Ram Chandra Mission. Let us also set an example so that the [illisible] once they look at us they should call ourselves as [illisible] members of such an Organisation, so that [illisible] our introduction [illisible] a lesson for [illisible] to follow.

With this in view we conclude our meeting.

Shri. P.C. Chadurvedi
Chairman of the Meeting.

Une succession bien peu spirituelle


Querelles & controverses
En 1974, Babuji nomme Chari pour lui succéder à la présidence de la SRCM. En 1982, il nomme son propre fils, Umesh Chandra Saxena. Il nie avoir jamais désigné Chari comme son successeur et il l’accuse d’attenter à sa vie depuis 8 ans.

Que s’est-il donc passé entre 74 et 82 pour un tel revirement ?

Deux nominations pour une seule présidence
Chari est introduit au Sahaj Marg en 1964. Il devient le secrétaire de Babuji en 1970 et l’entraîne dans une première tournée occidentale en 1972. Entre temps, le docteur Varadachari est décédé en 71.
Babuji fatigue et vieillit lui aussi. En 1973, Ragavendra Rao, Kasturi et Chari lui proposent de le décharger de son travail spirituel en se partageant les zones d’influence : Kasturi au nord, Rao au sud et Chari en dehors de l’Inde. Mais Babuji refuse. En 74, il est hospitalisé au Vivekananda Hospital de Lucknow. Au mois de mars, il fait sa déclaration de nomination de Chari à la présidence pour lui succéder. En 1979, il confirme son choix de Chari à KC Narayana, lui disant qu’il devra travailler avec lui et le soutenir dans sa tâche. Un autre abhyasi, qui se présente sous ses seules initiales JM, prétend que Babuji le lui a aussi confirmé à Munich en 1980.
Effectivement en 1980, Babuji et Chari voyagent ensemble au Danemark puis à Munich. En bonne intelligence au début au Danemark, mais beaucoup moins à Munich ensuite semble-t-il. André Poray s’y oppose vivement à Chari, à tel point que ce dernier dit qu’il n’ira plus jamais en France (alors qu’il est en Allemagne). La rivalité entre Chari et Poray apparaît ouvertement.
En 1981, Ragavendra Rao et Ramachandra Reddy entraînent Umesh, le fils de Babuji, dans un long voyage officieux aux Etats-Unis. Ces 2 full précepteurs ne font pas mystère de leur opposition à Chari, et Umesh apparaît comme leur faire-valoir, même s’il prend peu part aux méditations collectives.

Une bien sombre année 1982
En 1982, Babuji est usé et le calendrier se précipite. Le 6 avril, Babuji écrit un courrier incendiaire à Chari. Celui-ci lui répond le 12, mais Babuji n’en a cure et rédige secrètement la lettre de nomination d’Umesh le 16.
En septembre, Babuji et Chari sont à Paris, tout comme André Poray. Babuji est au plus mal, il est malade et délire. Il ne peut marcher seul sans tomber sur les genoux, 2 hommes sont nécessaires pour le porter jusque dans le hall de méditation (d’après le témoignage de Michael). Chari n’y est pas le bienvenu et reste à l’écart.
Depuis Paris, Babuji écrit une lettre confidentielle à son disciple MD Jahagirdar le 2 septembre où il accuse Chari d’essayer de l’empoisonner depuis 1974, et de déclarer à tous qu’il sera le prochain président alors que lui Babuji ne l’a jamais nommé. Mais Jésus Christ le protège, et Babuji révèle à Jahagirdar qu’il a nommé son successeur sans le lui désigner nommément et 4 personnes associées )Michael estime qu’à ce moment là, on pouvait faire faire n’importe quoi à Babuji vu son état de santé).
Aussitôt après son retour en Inde, le 6 septembre, Babuji est hospitalisé à Delhi à l’AIIMS et à la Clinique Helvetia, jusqu’à son décès le 19 avril 1983.

Le comité au travail
Le 10 juillet 1983, une première rencontre du comité de travail de la SRCM officialise les candidatures à la présidence. Deux lettres de nomination sont examinées : celle de Chari et, plus curieux, celle de Sharad Saxena (petit-fils de Babuji et fils de Prakash). Rien encore en ce qui concerne Umesh. La demande de Sharad unanimement considérée comme frauduleuse est rejetée. Celle de Chari est mise en doute en raison d’un tampon de la poste antérieur à la date du courrier. Une nouvelle rencontre est programmée en février 1984.
Le comité se réunit donc à nouveau les 6 et 7 février. Chari n’est pas le bienvenu, ses partisans ont été violemment refoulés de l’ashram. Réexaminée, sa candidature est déclarée frauduleuse. Mais entre temps est arrivée la candidature d’Umesh. Il est reconnu comme le président de la SRCM. A charge pour lui de former un nouveau comité de travail et désigner un autre président intérimaire pour ce comité, afin d’éviter une scission et dans l’attente que Chari se fasse une raison.

Clairement, deux clans s’affrontent : les seniors précepteurs indiens rejettent Chari, beaucoup trop occidentalisé à leurs yeux. Son rival André Poray s’est rallié à cette cause avec une partie des disciples français. Pour l’exclure et par souci de légitimation, ils ont reporté leur choix sur Umesh, le fils de Babuji. Mais dans les deux camps, tout le monde s’accorde pour dire que les enfants de Babuji n’ont jamais montré un intérêt particulier pour le Sahaj Marg de leur père.
De son côté, Chari est soutenu par la communauté occidentale, principalement au Danemark, aux Etats-Unis et en Allemagne (elle est plus partagée en France, on l’a vu). Néanmoins en Inde, Kasturi et KC Narayana, le fils du docteur Varadachari, lui apportent leur soutien. KC Narayana est le seul membre du comité de travail à avoir confirmé la validité de la lettre de nomination de Chari.

Le secrétaire général SA Sarnad est chargé de diffuser partout la nomination d’Umesh et les minutes du comité de travail dans une circulaire. Une assemblée générale réunissant 982 abhyasis a lieu le 8 février et entérine les décisions prises par le comité. La circulaire est rédigée le 15 février. SP Srivastava est nommé président du nouveau comité de travail de la SRCM le 20 mars.
Chari s’empare des ashrams de Chennai et Hyderabad. SA Sarnad rejoint les rangs de Chari et la circulaire n’est pas envoyée partout. Chari écrit à tous les précepteurs pour réclamer leur allégeance ou leur destitution. Les ashrams de Visakhapatnam, Nellore et Vadodara passent sous sa coupe.

En 1991, KC Narayana cesse de soutenir Chari et le quitte, puis c’est au tour de Kasturi en 1995…


Liens :


Déclaration de nomination d’Umesh


Nomination of Umesh as the Spiritual Representative 1982.04.16, entitled "DECLARATION/NOMINATION" (written: not specified)

"I, Ram Chandra, Founder President of Shri Ram Chandra Mission, Diwan jograj, Shahjahanpur in Exercise of my Power under Rule 3 and 4 of the Rules and constitution of my Private Trust/Society, on my free Will and Accord and upon the due consideration of the totality of the circumstances prevailing in my said Mission including wishes and blessing of the Almighty and that of my Samarth Guru Shri Ram Chandraji Maharaj of Fatehgarh, do hereby nominate my Spiritual Representative as also my son Shri Umesh Chandra Saxena as Successor President of Shri Ram Chandra Mission Shahjahanpur, with liberty to him, to further nominate his successor President of Shri Ram Chandra Mission with the condition that the person so nominated by him as his successor President of the said Mission must be his spiritual representatives in his direct line of succession.
I shall however continue as President of aforesaid Mission till my life time and this nomination shall come into play only after my death.
Previous nomination if any, made by me, shall stand superceeded and cancelled.
Affectionately yours
RAM CHANDRA"

The letter is signed with Babuji's signature, stamped 3 times by the same stamp mentionning "Notary Public, India" and "App by Govt. of India, T.S. Upadryay" (not sure for the last word - almost illisible).
The copy is attested with a stamp mentionning "Attested Feu [??] Photo Copy, Notory Public, Noida", signed and added manually with the date of 16/9/93.

Liens :
- Une succession bien peu spirituelle
- Nomination de Chari
- Nomination d’Umesh
- Lettre de Babuji à Jahagirdar
- Procès-verbaux de la SRCM en 1984
- Circulaire de nomination du président
- Babuji et sa famille
- La SRCM et l’ashram de Shahjahanpur

Circulaire du Secrétaire S.A. Sarnad en date du 15 février 1984

CIRCULAR
To All the members of the working committee,
Centre-in-charges/Preceptors/Organisors
of Shri Ram Chandra Mission in India
and Abroad :
Sub : Declaration of Successor President
of Shri Ram Chandra Mission,
Shahjahanpur. U.P.

Dear Brothers/Sisters,
Here I am pleased to inform you that our Revered Master Shri Ram Chandraji Maharaj had nominated Shri Umesh Chandra Saxena vide declaration/nomination letter dated 16.04082 and the same was produced before the member of the working committee on the 6th and 7th. Feb. 1984 for approval and consent of the members and the members present have accepted and approved the nomination dt. 16.04.82 in favour of Shri Umesh Chandra Saxena S/o Late Mahatma Ram Chandraji Maharaj. Hence with effect from 7th. Feb. 1984 Mr. Umesh Chandra Saxena is now the SUCCESSOR PRESIDENT of Shri RAM Chandra Mission Shahjahanpur.
The Minutes of the working committee were further produced before the General Body members of Shri Ram Chandra Mission and the declaration/Nomination letter dt. 16.04.82 were unanismously approved and accepted, this is just for the information of the brothers and sisters. In this connection kindly find enclosed the following for your record of information.
1. The Copy of Declaration/Nomination Letter dt. 16.04.82
2. Extract of the minutes of the working committee meeting held on 6th. And 7th. Feb. 1984.
3. Extract of the minutes of the General Body meeting held on 8th. Feb. 1984.
We request all the members/abhiyasis/Preceptors/organisors to cooperate with the President of Shri Ram Chandra Mission, Shahjahanpur.
Yours affectionately
S.A. SARNAD
SECRETARY
CC Shri Umesh Chandra Saxena
President SRCM


Liens :
- Une succession bien peu spirituelle
- Nomination de Chari
- Nomination d’Umesh
- Lettre de Babuji à Jahagirdar
- Procès-verbaux de la SRCM en 1984

La declaration de nomination de Chari


Nomination of Chari as the President of the Mission, dated from the 23rd March 1974, not specified were it was written

"I hereby nominate my disciple Sri. P. Rajagopalachari as my representative to work for the Mission as President in the Sahaj Marg System. As long as I live, I will be doing my job, Afterwards he will enjoy the fullfledged authority given by the Constitution and bye-laws of the Mission.
May God's grace shower through him to all mankind.
President
Shri Ram Chandra Mission
Shahjahanpur U.P. (India)"


The letter is signed with Babuji's signature.

Babuji a donc rédigé une courte lettre de nomination de Chari. Elle est datée du 23 mars 1974. Il est désigné comme « son représentant pour accomplir le travail de la Mission en tant que Président ».
Kasturi déclare que Babuji lui a dicté la déclaration. KC Narayana confirme son existence et sa véracité mais ajoute qu’elle n’a pas été attestée par des témoins. Un disciple qui se fait appeler JM pour conserver son anonymat dit que Kasturi et Donald Sabourin en furent témoins.
Lors du comité de travail de la SRCM des 6 et 7 février 1984, il est signalé que la déclaration est datée du 23 mars, alors que le tampon du courrier est antérieur et porte la date du 19 mars, ce qui amène les membres du comité à craindre quelque chose de louche. Le secrétaire général ajoute que Babuji s’est plaint de la disparition de papiers à entête de la SRCM dès le 30 décembre 1976. Umesh Chandra Saxena produit un document qui établit que les Sabourin n’étaient plus en Inde mais sont retournés au Canada lorsque Babuji est censé avoir écrit cette lettre.
Umesh et ses enfants ajoutent que jamais Babuji n’aurait pu écrire une telle lettre sans citer son maître Lalaji. Ils disent en outre que les statuts de la SRCM rédigés par Babuji spécifient qu’elle ne peut être présidée que par « son fondateur ou son représentant spirituel, en ligne directe de succession », ce qui signifie pour eux un descendant direct.

Liens :
- Une succession bien peu spirituelle
- Nomination d’Umesh
-Chari (en chantier)

Témoignage de Michael

Michael a fait partie de la SRCM aux USA de 1979 à 88 et est très vite devenu précepteur. Il nous parle de toutes ces personnalités qui ont compté dans l'histoire du Sahaj Marg : Babuji et Rajagopalachari, mais aussi André Poray et Kasturi entre autres. Il nous dévoile surtout les jeux de pouvoirs qui ont eu lieu dans le cercle rapproché (inner circle) du maître, celui de Babuji d'abord, celui de Chari ensuite.



Voici son témoignage, mais n’hésitez pas à aller sur le website de Michael :


Introduction


Over 20 years ago when I was young and impressionable, I decided to react against my protestant upbringing and explore eastern thought and meditation pracitces. Living in the northeast, there were ample choices from the Tibetan Buddist temple down the street to the Vipasana Meditation Center out in Western Massachusetts. I sought something more personal, and discovered a rag tag group of people in the US who were learning a reformed version of Raj Yoga that had somehow had combined Sufism with Yoga to create a meditative, spiritual practice. The organziation was called the Shri Ram Chandra Mission. The method of meditation they practiced was called Sahaj Marg, which means natural path.I traveled to India to meet Ram Chandra, or Babuji as they called him. He was an aging retired bank clerk with an impressive presence. He still traveled to the west occasionally, but within a few years he passed away. One character who dominated in the organization was Parthasarathi Rajagopalachari, kindly referred to as Chari. This man was an imposing westernized, cigarette smoking Indian who ran a mill in India. He had the financial freedom and drive to attend most of Ram Chandra international travels.When Babjuji passed, Chari surfaced as his hand picked successor. This caused great controversy in India and parts of Europe, as many were offended by his strong and apparently arrogant personality and aggressive approach to running a spiritual organization. For Americans, it was normal, so many of us just accepted this behavior as status quo.This story is about my hasty indoctrination into Chari's inner circle and just as hasty removal. The lessons learned from human behavior around people and positions of power and influence has guided my life for more than a decade of experience. I attempt to explain in this story the evolution of my thinking starting from this experience of over 15 years ago to present day.The other objective of this blog is for those who currently belong to this organization, which has evolved into a large international organization that hungrily buys real estate like castles in Europe and entire neighborhoods in India. Those who choose to leave the organization are confronted with subtle and not so subtle threats of great spiritual destitude and abandonment. While I have no intention to convince anyone to leave, I do want to let those who choose to leave, that life on the other side is fine and ones spiritual quest, what ever form it takes when one leaves such an organization, does indeed continue.


1. The Founder's Last Years - describing my experiences in the Mission during Babuji's last years from 1979 to 1983

2. Death of the Master - Chariji's Early Days - outlining the power struggle that followed Babuji's death and Chari's establishment as the new President and Spiritual Representative of Babuji.

3. The Publishing Commitee - my experiences during my invovlement in recording and publishing Chari's speeches.

4. Establishing New Principles - observations regarding Chariji's efforts to establish "Service and Obedience to the Mission" as a new key directive in the practice of Sahaj Marg

5. My Departure - description of my departure from the mission

6. Meeting New Masters - exploration of the history of Sahaj Marg

7. Recovering from SRCM - my recovery process from more than 10 years of indoctrination

8. Analysis - My personal analysis of how cultism evolves and the source of a Guru's power.


LESSONS IN POWER Part 1: The Founder's Last Years


When I joined SRCM in 1979, I was 19 years old. I had taught myself to meditate at the age of 13 and wished to receive some training and guidance. I sought out a low key organization that didn’t want money or exploit people. I was not interested in joining a cult but sincerely wanted to explore how meditation could calm the mind and help one in their journey towards God. Sahaj Marg seemed perfect for me. This organization seemed not to be about money at all. Several key factors attracted me.1. Prosthelytizing was not encouraged2. Training was offered for free3. There was no focus on buildings or property4. The practice did not involve cultural or religious indoctrination5. Focus on experience as opposed to study of the practiceAt the time I joined, Babuji was in his last years. I traveled to Denmark in 1980 to meet him for the first time. Here I also met Chari, his apparent right hand man when traveling abroad. Chari was a very westernized, Dunhill smoking Indian executive. He seemed very European and interacted well with the westerners. He was clearly part of Babuji’s inner circle.The Danish center was one of the first in the west, with an impressive group of middle aged, successful abhaysis who seemed to love Babuji had integrated Sahaj Marg into their European lifestyle. This impressed me, as they did not dress up as Indians or pretend to be something other than Danes.Babuji spoke little, preferring to sit with his disciples and smoke his sweet tobacco smelling hooka pipe. When he traveled, he would publish a short message in lieu of giving public talks, and instead remained available for people to simply sit quietly with him. Occasionally, he would offer to meditate with the group. It was a compelling experience for a young impressionable 20 year old such as myself.I followed him to Munich where things turned dark. Andre Poray, who was a senior French Preceptor was there and appeared to be a rival of Chari’s. The rumors were that Andre, while extremely successful in attracting large numbers in France, had also attracted people who were not necessarily sincere in their spiritual practice but were interested in black arts. I can’t say for sure whether these rumors were true or not, but, I witnessed the beginning of a very dark series of events. Babuji suddenly stopped being available to the larger group, and Chari’s demeanor went from jovial westernized Indian to being very curt and secretive.I left Munich this point, but others close to me told stories of Babuji and Chariji showing up for a group meditation dressed in black. A group meditation occurred where some one meditating in the crowd shouted out and became delirious. Andre Poray helped to remove him from the room and the sitting was topped. Babuji quickly left the scene with Chari. Later Chari was quoted as saying, “I will never go to France again”. Given that he was in Germany, the assumption was that this little incident had something to do with the goings on in France and the rivalry between Andre Poray and Chari. Having missed some of these incidents, I choose not to think too much about them until much later in my practice.Prior to my first trip to India in 1981, three Indians did an un-authorized tour of the US. Babuji’s son, Umesh Saxena, and two senior preceptors, Ragavendra Rao and RamaChandra Reddy. They stayed in my center for a week or more, and traveled a bit to centers in the US. It was made clear however that this was an “unofficial” visit. The intent of this trip seemed innocent at the time. I befriended the two senior Preceptors, and they clearly made great efforts to get favor with the Americans, going so far as to dress up in western suits when meeting prospective abhyasis for the first time.Umesh, Babuji’s son, seemed to me to be along for the ride. He was not a preceptor, and occasionally took sittings. He told a few stories about pretending to give sittings to kids while growing up. There was some talk about him being able to transmit because he was Babuji’s son, but, he was for some reason not allowed to do so. In retrospect, this was the second incident I witnessed that indicated some internal strife within the organization that had been created to make Sahaj Marg available, but at the time, I was young and naive, and willing to overlook the obvious.I traveled to India in 1981 and stayed in the Ashram in Shahjahanpur. It was the only property the Mission owned at the time – a beautiful complex located a few miles from Babuji’s house. Prior to this property, abhyasis would stay at Babuji’s house. The ashram was built to accommodate the larger numbers that started to travel to visit Babuji. No money was requested, but donations were accepted to pay for food and operations. The basic feeling was that of hospitality, we were Babuji’s guests.The last time I saw Babuji was in France. Chari, who was not invited, went against his statement in Munich and showed up anyway. It was clear at this time that Andre Poray and Chari were in a bitter power struggle and a public display for the masses was put on. Andre ran the show, giving long talks and being seen with Babuji. Chari hid in his room and gave sittings. Privately he complained about the goings on in France. At one point he said, “I want to get up and give a talk of my own by putting a microphone to my heart and say, hear the voice of the Master”. He was allowed to give a talk, his talk was lengthy as well. I remember innocently telling him that it was a good talk but it was a bit long. He seemed shocked by this comment.During this last visit to the west, Babuji was frail and made few public appearances. In one appearance he was walked down the isle to give a sitting, two large men held each arm. His legs would give out and he would start to fall, they would hold him up and continue to walk him down towards the stage. I was sitting at the edge of the isle looking down sadly when Babuji was being walked by me. At that instant, in spite of the two men holding him up, he fell over on top of me. I was shocked and devastated. The message I received from this was that he was dying. This overshadowed the rest of the gathering, and overwhelmed any thoughts of the ongoing power struggle between Poray and Chari.



LESSONS IN POWER Part 2: Death Of The Master - Chari's Early Days


In 1983 Babuji grew sick. Conflicting messages came from various factions throughout India. Umesh Saxena clearly was attempting to take the stage by sending notices that Babuji would be healed and would live to the age of 100 or more. Babuji finally passed. At this point in time, the battle began for control of the Mission.Chari immediately produced his letter from Babuji stating that he was the designated successor. Umesh Saxena wrote a letter to all centers saying in broken English “I have little evidence that Chari’s claims are not correct”. Ragavendra Rao and his associates appeared to side with Umesh, and a legal battle ensued which prevented Chari from having control of the Ashram in Shahjahanpur. Chari eventually gained sufficient legal status to establish himself as the President of the Mission. He garnered support from the west, having befriended the more senior disciples in Denmark, Germany and the US. Almost immediately, he traveled to the west to establish his base, making speeches and publishing every talk he made for the masses to read.I made one trip to India to where Lalaji’s birthday was to be celebrated in Shahjahanpur. Chari choose to be there, although he was clearly not invited. A large group of Chari supporters arrived with Chari a week before the celebrations. Chari stayed in Babuji’s cottage, and kept Babuji’s Chair empty and visible as a symbol. I had married an Indian and spent my time with the Indian contingent and was asked to help with nighttime security, walking the compound. On the third night, an Indian friend told me that my help was not needed and that I should do and sleep. A jeep had pulled up and there was lots of talking going on. Clearly some sort of incident was about to happen, and the Indians were trying to protect me from it. That morning, I awoke to find gates locking the entrances to the dormitory. The water shut off, and all the staff who ran the Ashram were gone or hiding.People were able exit from small doors from the dormitory, and eventually it was decided that we were to all move to the farm next door run by the Tandon family, who were loyal to Chari. We stayed in tents and camped there in view of the Ashram. I was delegated as the Western Representative as I had recently had a suit tailored in India and had it with me. Chari seemed to like my innocent, and sincere way of explaining things. I was asked to have my account typed up by a typist, but in fact Chari dictated the entire account himself while I was present. I was sent to speak with the local magistrate and gave interviews to the press about the “international incident” that had occurred in Shahjahanpur. I took a letter signed by US abhyasis to the US embassy to file a formal complaint about our treatment there. This gained me lots of favor from Chari and allowed me a peek into his Inner Circle. The next year I was made Preceptor.



Lessons In Power Part 3: The Publishing Committee


Prior to my becoming a preceptor, the Zonal Secretary of the US had befriended me and asked me to be involved in the North American Publishing Committee. Since I was an engineer who designed digital recording equipment for a living, my skills were directed towards recording and editing Chari’s speeches. I remained on the periphery of the NAPC. The members of that committee were senior abhyasis who were loyal to Chari. Their efforts were clearly important to Chari and being a member of this committee afforded up close and personal meetings with him that often pre-empted other activities. Members of this committee used their involvement to gain exclusive access to Chari as a result. The atmosphere within the committee was that of exclusivity and importance. Chari’s style of managing this group was to insist on his total control of the flow of his words into published tapes, videos, and books. My involvement was tolerated due to the need for technical expertise, but in no way was I accepted into the inner fold. Secret meetings occurred without me on regular basis. These meetings generally involved discussions around the content of what was being published and I was only involved in discussions that required logistical or technical decisions.While I was sufficiently trusted to be allowed into this exclusive circle, activities in this committee required intense interaction with Chari and members jealously guarded that privilege by keeping me at arms length. Here I saw for the first time how a Guru uses his inner circle draw people in, and test their devotion to him. Others clearly saw that this was an opportunity for relative new comers such as myself to shine and gain favor. Subtle efforts were made to insure that my work was overshadowed by theirs. I was tasked with the un-glamorous work of running tape recorders and editing the recordings for publication. My job was to insure that Chari had a copy of every speech as soon as the speech was over. This was sufficiently important to him that I was allowed to deliver these tapes personally, however, other members of the committee would occasionally insist on intervening and delivering these tapes themselves. The unique attention I created from this new attention getting task was not going be allowed to be exclusively mine!Volumes of tape recordings were produced on a yearly basis, and it was my job to edit out French translation and delete harsh language. Chari appeared to improvise many of his speeches, and there were times when he needed his words changed by recording over phrases that he did not intend to say for posterity. Chari insisted on absolute control over his words. My job was to insure that bootleg recordings were discouraged and even confiscated.There seemed to be a dire concern that if abhyasis were allowed to make their own recordings Chari’s control over his intellectual property was breached. Rumors of abhyasis caught sharing bootleg speeches with others were investigated, and if found to be true, I would be asked to approach them and get all copies of tapes to secure Chari’s absolute control over the distribution of his words. By this time there was a large and growing group of French abhyasis who followed Chari around the world. They were particularly upset with me, as many were not fluent in English and used the tapes to interpret his speeches and private conversations. I was instructed to promise them that a French translation of the speech would be available at a later date.The Publishing Committee became increasingly interested in recording Chari’s private discussions. There was constant pressure to “know” when to turn on a tape recorder, and when, to shut it off. I was often chastised by members of the Committee for not recording something said in private, and at other times for allowing discussions to be recorded. Chari always reserved the right to have certain discussions erased or confiscated. Often in private, he would interrupt and ask if the tape recorder was on, when he was going to say something he particularly did or did not want published.He had established a sense of urgency within the Committee members to produce as much volume as possible, and left things sufficiently vague to create second guessing and rancor amongst the Committee members. Over time it was resolved that there were two primary objectives, generate as much of his published words as possible, and maintain absolute control over the content and distribution of his words.These objectives had two benefits for Chari. First was the revenue that the constant flow of new publications generated, as a supply and demand relationship was exploited around any new material that Chari produced. The second and more insidious benefit was that Chari could now re-interpret the practice of Sahaj Marg and systematically insert himself and any new messages of his own, into the constant flow of published speeches. Since Chari was particularly verbose, there was no shortage of opportunities to generate more content to be published. Eventually the pressure to record private talks evaporated as public speeches provided plenty of opportunities to find material.The Mission was still young in the west, anddid not charge money to abhyasis for training. This created challenges early on as these publications required up front money. Chari devised a plan where disciples were encouraged to purchase life subscriptions for puplications of Chari's new works. A sufficiently large fee was charged such that the bank interest from the fees could be used to fund the publishing efforts. Members had benefits of early access to new publications and in some instances exclusive access. With the publishing machine now funded and well oiled with capital, Chari used this machine to gradually shift attention away fro Babuji and his written words, and focus it squarely on himself and his dedication to grow the Mission as an example of devotion to his Master.



Lessons In Power Part 4: Establishing New Principles


While Chari kept Babuji’s primary message of heart based meditation alive and accurate, he was also slowly inserting new principles and directives for abhyasis. He presented himself as the model abhyasi. His devotion to serving his Master by growing his Mission in size and numbers was becoming a new and repetitive addition the core practice of Sahaj Marg.As abhyasis came to accept Chari as the Master, a Master whose example should be emulated, they began to accept the same sense of urgency to grow the organization in numbers as a new integral part of their practice. By the sheer volume of text generated annually from Chari’s speeches and the absolute control over its distribution, this new concept of “Serving the Mission” as part of the actual practice of Sahaj Marg was being introduced as a constant underlying message in practically every speech Chari published. Success was measured in the quantity of new abyasis joining the Mission. The lack of growth in numbers was systematically equated to a lack of spiritual growth. A particular Preceptor or even Center was judged by the annual growth of abhyasis and chastized when numbers did not grow significantly on an annual basis.Integral to the "Growth In Numbers" directive, was a new urgency to move group meditations out of the homes of Preceptors and into purchased or rented meditation halls. In addition, for the first time, Chari began planting the idea that the US should purchase property for its own Ashram. These efforts required money. More wealthy abhyasis eagerly donated to the cause which spawned a flurry of activity to raise more money. Dedicated abhyasis were approached and asked to make regular monthly donations to support this new costly effort to acquire property.By this time Chari had established a powerful and well financed communications machine to spread the not so sublte message that with Mission Growth, came the need for abhyasis to dig into their wallets and donate money. Large gatherings became revenue generating events, where fees charged for attendance exceeded the expenses. Once gatherings became profitable, the need to reduce overhead by owning, not renting the halls where gatherings took place became tantamount. It was insisted that, these purchased properties were important as the Master could infuse his spiritual power into them and they would become holy places for spiritual gatherings.By the mid 1980s France had purchased an estate in Augerans and the castle on the estate was transformed into a residence hall for visiting abhyasis and the visiting Master. The US could not be outdone and privately some wealthy Indian abhyasis conspired to purchase some property in Troy New York from an abhyasis. Somehow this deal was not officially sanctioned by Chari. It posed an interesting problem that an individual abhyasi was financially benefiting from the Mission by selling his property to it. The wealthy Indians believed that if they executed a private deal between themselves and the property owner, then donated the property to the Mission, this could be worked around. This created difficult political problems and eventually Mission funds were used for the transaction.Meanwhile, the initiative to build an Ashram in the US spawned competition between various centers throughout the US to find the perfect site for an Ashram. This flurry of activity was fueled by the belief that an Ashram in your center equated to more favor and access to the Master, Chari.Within a short 7 years, Chari had completely transformed the Shri Ram Chandra Mission. New principles were being introduced in Chari's speeches that focused on "service to the Mission". This new Mission was being transformed into an organization that required unquestioned loyalty and obedience. Rather than being a light structure used to serve in the spiritual training of abhyasis, service to the Mission was becoming an integral part of the practice of Sahaj Marg.



Lessons in Power Part 5: My Departure


The Gathering:I arrived at an SRCM gathering in 1988 showered with congratulations from abhyasis I didn't even know. Apparently, without my knowledge, it had been announced to the entire group that I was to become a preceptor. This disturbed me a bit as I wasn't even asked if I wanted the job, and I lived in a particular center that was plagued by in fighting amongst preceptors and senior abhyasis.In those days I was still impressionable with position and authority, and the glamour of being appointed by the Master to this position without being asked was intoxicating, so I fell for it. In reality, the correct response should have been to just say no, but that would be done for me a few years later.The reality was that I wasn't appointed because of my spiritual abilities or sincerity, but as a political ploy by a Zonal Secretary who wanted to have the senior preceptor in my center removed. It was a political appointment, and was made clear to me that my job was to help. I reacted by simply making my home open to people for meditation. I tried to avoid the politics by having a quiet place where people could come and meditate without being subjected to the in fighting in the center. I did what I could to shield new abhyasis from the inner rancor of our center.The Inner Circle Event:Then a year later it happened. I was drawn into one of Chari's many inner circle love fests - Select abhyasis sitting in Chari's presence without the "riff-raff" present.Chari, was handing out prasad saying things like, "this is for the beautiful wife of so and so" and "this is for he who wears a scarf"... In retrospect, the scene was not unlike that of a dog trainer throwing treats to his animals to see what tricks they would do for him.Then he got serious for a moment and said, "This is for he who is pure of heart". The Zonal Secretary blatantly put out his hand to take the prasad, instead, Chari handed it to me. I reached out my hand in awe and took it. Jokingly I told the Zonal Secretary, “If it makes you feel better, that was extremely hard to swallow”.This was the beginning of the end of my preceptor-ship in Sahaj Marg. From that day on, the Zonal Secretary turned from being my "friend" to doing what he could to marginalize me which ultimately led to my removal as preceptor.If I was ambitious like others in the inner circle, I would have fought to retain my position, but, by that time, I had learned a little bit about the lure of power, and chose not to. I resigned all my administrative positions within the organization and proceeded to take a very low profile hoping that somehow the Master would intervene.This is how things work in the inner circle. Those who desire influence and control, fight for it amongst each other in the presence of the Master and behind his back. The Master rewards those left standing with positions of authority. It’s an interesting version of "survival of the fittest". The Zonal Secretary eventually lost to a more ambitious individual; in fact his position was all but eliminated. There's truth to the saying, "He who lives by the sword, dies by the sword."Retrospect:Chari eventually did intervene. I was removed as a Preceptor in the same manner as how I was made one. No warning, just a letter announcing that while my services as a preceptor were appreciated, they were no longer required. Aside from the method of delivery of this message, I was relieved. Chari was completely unable to tell me what I did wrong other than a cryptic message stating that I should, "Just sit tight and keep a low profile. In six months, I'll make you a preceptor again." He seemed oblivious to the lessons I was learning from all of this. I had just paid a price for selfishly accepting a position of power to begin with, why would I want to be lured into taking it again?Whatever reasons Chari has for tolerating these goings on in his circle, it was clear that he wasn't about to confide in me. Having still much to learn about the temptations of power, and Chari’s assumption that I was driven by my desire to have it in the form of preceptor-ship, it was clear that he was in no position to guide me at that critical time in my existence. I needed to leave the SRCM to learn this important aspect of reality. I am relieved that I left when I did, as Chari was in no position to provide me with the support or guidance during the dark times ahead of me, nor was any of his "preceptors". SRCM encourages dependence on the Master, what I needed to do was face what was ahead of me alone to learn that in reality, I am not alone nor am I independent.I have proceeded in my "material" life to have power and authority positions in companies and organizations, reaching a pinnacle in the corporate world. While no doubt I still have much to learn, my conclusions today are as follows:When Given Power:1. Understand your responsibility in accepting it2. Understand why you are given it.3. Treat it responsibly and execute selflessly4. Remember that no one is master of the power they have.5. Power becomes the master to one who becomes attached to it.In SRCM, these aspects of power are implied in the teachings and philosophy, but no practical training is provided. Worse yet, the SRCM administrative hierarchy is itself entangled in a web of power that takes on a life of its own. Surely Chari understands this, but apparently is willing to let this happen for some end that he cannot explain other than "I am following the instructions of my Master".We can only hope that the end does justify the means. For myself, I've taken refuge in the private sector and found a bounty of spiritual lessons to learn there. While there is no living, breathing master to guide me through the dark times, guidance comes from the most unexpected places if one remains sensitive to it. To this day I remain grateful for the lessons I have learned from all these events.I have nothing but love and best wishes for those who practice Sahaj Marg today. I hope that all find their way. For those who wish to leave but fear the consequences, I only hope that I can stand as proof that ones journey continues even outside the bounds of SRCM.In his early days as a master, Chari was fond of saying, "The Proof of the Pudding is in the eating of it", when justifying spiritual practice verses scholarly study of spirituality.I would counter; "The goal of one's life is to live it.”



Lessons In Power Part 6: Meeting Other Masters


Right up to the end of my involvement in SRCM, I had truly believed that Chari had a noble objective and somehow the right thing would happen. Instead I was betrayed and treated like a pawn within the inner circle. My example caused fear in the ranks, followed by an unspoken assumption that I clearly must have done something really bad. It was assumed by some, that I was simply a hot head who stood up to authority and questioned the intentions and integrity of people like the Zonal Secretary, but I tried to do the right thing in a very bad situation. I was punished for not completely surrendering to the temptation of spiritual attainment and power.I exchanged a couple of fruitless correspondences with Chari only to find his story towards me evolve with every iteration. It started with tempting me with restoration of my preceptor position if I would just keep a low profile and stay in the Mission, to insisting that I had been “Disobedient in matters of the Mission”, then praising me as one of his most sincere disciples, one of only two westerners whom he blessed marrying an Indian woman. After saying my good byes to a few friends in the SRCM, I left with a huge sense of relief, never to looked back.Meanwhile, my troubled marriage with an Indian woman continued. We had not been able to have children for 7 years of marriage, suddenly, after leaving the organization, this difficult relationship became more complicated with the birth of my first son. Chari would always tell us that we should not expect to have children and accept our fate - yet, almost as soon as we departed from the organizaton, the situation changed.In all this I began my search for answers. A close Indian friend, PEN, who knew and was associated with Ramana Maharshi took me under his wing. This gentle fellow, an engineer by trade, introduced me to a wealth of knowledge about spirituality and yoga. Never once did he expect me to join anything, but simply share in the knowledge and quest. I got interested in the writings of Vivekananda and started to learn about traditional Raja Yoga. PEN took me to a Vedanta society center to get books and explore their culture. PEN, being an extremely westernized Indian, acknowledged strange attitude people associated with Vivekananda had towards women, keeping them separate from men in meditation. I was immediately reminded of how Chari started to enforce this in SRCM in the west. Indian culture seems to want to deal with sexuality in spirituality by pretending its not there. This created a bit of turmoil in me, having just left a cult, I was certainly not going to join another one. I was sufficiently indoctrinated into Indian culture through my marriage. Getting involved in any organization like this would require me to give up entirely my heritage as a westerner. My exploration in this area was acedemic and short.I had also discovered through an abhyasi who came to me for meditations, that an Indian fellow who knew Lalaji was still alive. I was introduced to a local doctor who had met this man and was starting to have meditation sessions in his home. I met with the Doctor and started to meet people who had gathered in his home, most refugees from a local academy that taught eastern thought. I hesitated to get too involved, but this Indian, who we called Ranaji Saheb, came to stay in the Doctor’s home.I took time off work to meet him. His demeanor was similar to Babuji’s. He loved to hear people to sing. People would simply sit with him silently with occasional discussion or song. I liked this man, but both he and I knew that I was not about to give my obedience and trust to him or any one else. While Ranaji had made it clear to the Doctor that he must completely submit to him if spiritual progress was to occur, he told me quite a different thing. Ranaji advised that I should explore my Christian roots. Both the Doctor and I had observed the inner circle culture revolving around this man. Ranaji didn’t seem to exploit it, but people attracted to the possibility of gaining spiritual power and advancement by association with him, showed all the typical signs of fighting for his favor and attention. Both the Doctor and I decided to cease our association with Ranaji and I have completely lost track of him and do not even know if he is still alive.From Ranaji, I learned about Lalaji and his brother. Both were considered spiritual twins. Ranaji explained that Lalaji was a Hindu Sufi of the Naqushabandhi path. Teachers of this path typically did not create organizations, or had singular lineages, but strove to elevate humanity around them by association. Many travel to live with their disciples like a grandfather. Then move on so as not to foster too much attachment to them personally. I learned that a Russian woman, Irina Tweedie, had spent time with a disciple of Lalaji’s brother and started an organization called the Golden Sufi.Irina had gotten old and reclusive, but her successor Llewellyn Vaughn Lee, and I corresponded for a year or two. This organization focused on dream analysis and meditation. I was not particularly interested in joining, but was very interested in learning more about the history.My life by this time was flooded with dream like experiences far more profound than those found in my sleeping dreams, so dream analysis intrigued me. I decided to make a trip to New York City when Llewellyn was visiting there. We met in a small group at a book store. He seemed happy to see me and treated me with respect, like a peer of sorts. I appreciated this. The group meditated, followed by people telling Lewellyn about their dreams. A woman who was casually visiting told of a dream, and was convinced that she should attend the next day as a guest of Llewellyns. Others were chastised for their dreams. It was starting to become clear to me that this telling of dreams puts the teller in an extremely vulnerable position. Analysis of dreams can be used to pump up a deflated ego, or tear down an inflated one.The next day, I attended another meeting. This time, I spoke about one of my real life dream like experiences - my son being born. His mother would not touch him or hold him at the time of birth. The nurse in frustration this unresponsiveness handed my son to me instead. The surroundings became surreal, everyone seemed to disappear. It was only me and my son. In spite of being less than a couple minutes old, he opened his eyes for the first time and looked straight into mine for what seemed to be an eternity. This shook me to the core as it was as if I was looking into the eyes of God. We stood together by a window looking out over the city together for at least 10 minutes. A silent communication occured during that time, that could not be explained in words.After explaining this story in a somewhat emotional manner, Llewellyn proceeded to tear me apart. Asking me what I really wanted, and why I was there. I stated that I was there to learn about his path. He went on to tell me that I had already been lead down the garden path, believing that spiritual achievement was the goal when simply being was the path.I left New York City by train that night, thinking about what he had said. What he said was true. I had already concluded that before hearing it from him, but the message was delivered in a manner such that I was humiliated in front of his disciples. I had broken the peer relationship by sharing a dream like experience and becoming vulnerable to a master. Yet again another inner circle experience had occurred. Humiliation was used to determine the sincerity and trust of a potential disciple. I had seen enough. I wrote one last letter thanking Llewellyn for the meeting and never heard from him again.My last meeting was by happenstance. I met an old local Indian man named Mr. Rao. He taught yoga at a community center and had a small following. He seemed humble and took no money and seemed uninterested in creating much attention around himself. Mr. Rao came to my house for dinner and decided to read my palm and tell me something about myself. He did not read my palm at all, but simply took my hand and looked at me in the eyes. He said the following:“You were a prodigy in your youth. Had you developed your material and spiritual self simultaneously at an early age, you would have achieved great things by the age of 27, but you did not receive proper guidance and got distracted in the spiritual path you took. Because you did not develop materially at the same time, your efforts in spirituality were fruitless. You lost that chance and must now focus on your material development. By the age of 47, you again will start to find your spiritual and material ballance. You then must develop both aspects of yourself in tandem for some time. You will truly succeed and by the age of 54 will have achieved all that is possible from a balanced existence. Guidance will come to you and you do not need to seek it out.”It was as if Mr. Rao was using my own words, not his. Intuitively I knew that I had to focus on my career, which was starting to blossom, and somehow deal with an incredibly unhealthy and abusive family life that was evolving in my home.I had finally come to the end of my quest of eastern spirituality only to find out that I had to develop my western existence and embrace who I already was. I focused the next several years on entrepreneurial efforts, developing my executive management skills and starting my own technology companies. I saw great success materialy. All along, my spiritual quest continued, not in a spiritual setting, but in corporate America. I saw demons and saints in the corporate world. It was there that I finally met a handful of people who knew how to handle positions of power in a selfless manner.I realized that power, whether spiritual, political or corporate, is power. Humans in positions of power are easily corrupted by it, be it spiritual or corporate. The likelihood of discovering a person who is not corrupted by power is equally possible in a spiritual organization as it is in a corporate setting. Inner circles are created for the same reason in both types of organizations. I found at least the corporate world far more honest about the inner circle’s purpose. The hierarchy has a purpose and is know by all. A President has a function. When they cease to perform, they move on. If they violate ethics they are removed. Unfortunately this does not occur in spiritual organizations. My spiritual quest continued in the offices of corporate America for quite some time. It was several years before I took Ranaji’s advice and re-explored my roots in Christianity.



Lessons In Power Part 7: My Recovery From SRCM


Sahaj Marg is a system of energy manipulation and power. The basis of the practice is to create a craving, or sense of urgency for God realization in the heart. The disciple performs a daily cleaning process using their own will force, to remove the effects of experiences that cause impressions that limit ones spiritual approach. The Guru/Preceptor further uses their own will force to push these spiritual impurities out of the disciple. Transmission is a transfer of spiritual energy through the will force of the Master or a Preceptor to the recipient to establish more advanced spiritual conditions in the disciple.This entire system revolves around all participants using their own will force to achieve spiritual attainment at a rate that is accelerated compared to ones natural evolution. While Sahaj Marg stands for “Natural Path” it is in fact a practice that cheats nature by using the force of will to accelerate ones natural development. It is based on accepting that one starts from a place of spiritual inadequacy and requires the external will force of others to rectify the situation. The problem that occurred in me practicing Sahaj Marg, was the constant reinforcement of the need to push to a higher level of attainment, no to mention the constant reinforcement of spiritual inadequacy. At the same time humility is required to keep the ego in check. Sahaj Marg solves this problem by establishing the need for a living Master to surrender to.A forced craving is established within that causes one to become obsessed with spiritual development which diverts ones priorities away from other worldly activities. This is often mistaken for non-attachment, but is in fact the establishment of a new attachment to the achievement of spiritual power through the dependence on the will force of a living Master.Recovering from spiritual obsession developed under this system is an involved and time consuming process and my case was no exception. I continued to desire spiritual attainment after leaving SRCM and explored spiritual practices that involve manipulating ones inner energy and power to that end. Having cut off my association with any Guru, I was on my own, which turned out to be my saving grace. Every effort to manipulate power for my own spiritual gain resulted in failure. I started to practice Raja Yoga breathing exercises and immediately contracted bronchitis, which discouraged me from continuing.My experience with the Golden Sufi organization, being publicly humiliated for being associated with a practice that had spiritual attainment as it’s goal was another shock. Meeting Ranaji Saheb, Lalaji’s disciple was another revealing experience. His recommendation that I explore my Christian roots, caused me to question further whether having a goal of ultimate spiritual attainment at all was a worthy endeavor.As I proceeded in my business career, I started to notice some successful people leveraged their success as good stewards to humanity, while others selfishly pillaged what they could for personal gain. This reflected back to my experience in SRCM, seeing how some “advanced” abyhasis appeared very selfish an self serving, yet others did not.I started to learn about the boundaries that one must place around oneself to protect against malicious attacks. Such attacks can come from the financial, physical, emotional and spiritual levels. One of these important boundaries was learning how and when to trust another person. When one achieves a level of attainment on any level, those who desire to topple or steal their attainment often attack them. This is equally prevalent in spiritual groups as it is in corporate and secular environments.My practice of Sahaj Marg, and the resulting dependence and trust in a Master at such an early age caused me to not properly develop my boundaries with the world around me. This became a harsh lesson as I learned to deal with an abusive and mentally ill spouse and the Machiavellian politics of corporations and venture capitalists.From my experiences after departing SRCM, I learned that the Inner Circle created by Gurus, is in fact a useful tool for self-preservation. A Guru of course has lots to loose, and must only trust those who have completely submitted to him. On a personal level, I learned that my trust must be earned, not simply due to repeated association, but by observing how individuals around me reacted to difficult situations. Under such pressure, one shows their true self. I learned the importance of establishing my own trusted inner circle, which to this day is a small group of individuals. I also learned that the strength of having others one can trust, establishes a base for ones own actions and contributions to the world. Inner Circles like anything can be used as a valid setting of boundaries, or as a base for power and manipulation. My experiences outside of SRCM helped to define these differences and determine exactly how I should use this concept to protect myself without falling into the lure of power and imposing that power on others.The most difficult Sahaj Marg artifact to eliminate was the sense of urgency to become a more spiritually evolved person. This urgency ingrained in Sahaj Marg abhyasis reinforces a low self-image and a desire to overcome ones limitations through the dependence on the strength of others. The humility of this dependence on others is in fact not humility at all, but self-deprecation. Left unchecked for years on end, it creates a behavior pattern that assumes false security that the Master will eventually correct ones faults and one will achieve spiritual greatness.My re-examination into Christianity led me to the Catholic Church. I found people there who practice silent prayer, and re-learned Jesus’ message of forgiving ones self and others for their humanity and non-judgment. Meeting regular people doing charitable work within the church was the most inspiring message for me in my recovery of a power based spiritual practice. These people did not pretend to be anything other than what they were, humans with imperfections, but through their imperfect but sincere action they did extraordinary things.After 15 years of struggling with my addictions to spiritual power, I sat in prayerful meditation one day. I felt restless, not very inspired, no swirling energy around the heart, head or central point at the base of the skull. In spite of this I felt my being. I accepted my spiritual being as it was, a gift from God, sacred in all its mediocrity. I suddenly felt free to accept my spiritual self for who I was. All sense of inadequacy faded, and I realized that the true subtle condition that is spoken about in SRCM has nothing to do with attainment through will force and power, but through acceptance of ones self. This can be achieved in an instant without the dependence on a Master, but it does require one to accept and live the life that is laid before them. True humility and charity is developed in real life as one learns their own humanity and human limitations.A long path was taken to get me back to where I started at the tender age of 19 when I was first introduced to SRCM. I finally learned that it was ok to be me - that my lack of spiritual prowess was in fact an illusion. Accepting this allowed me to finally start my spiritual practice - the practice of accepting my life and living it, accepting my humanity and being it. The lessons in power learned from the process, however will serve me for the rest of my life.



LESSONS IN POWER PART 8: ANALYSIS


HistorySahaj Marg was introduced as a revised method of Raja Yoga by Ram Chandra of Shajahanpur, India in the 1940s. Ram Chandra, referred to as Babuji, was a young disciple of Ram Chandra of Fategar, no relation, and affectionately referred to as Lalaji. Lalaji and his brother were a disciples of a muslim Sufi master who taught them the Sufi method of meditation and acknowledged its historical foundation in Vedic meditation practices.Being young Babuji visited Lalaji only a couple times, and spent most of his time practicing meditation at a distance from Lalaji and corresponding with him by letters. When Lalaji passed away, he left many sincere disciples behind. It remains a controversy as to whether Lalaji intended an organization to be formed around his legacy or chose to have a single successor. His Sufi Master clearly had no organization, nor did he delegate anyone his sole successor, nor did Lalaji establish any organization around himself or his teachings. His brother, considered a spiritual twin also left a legacy of disciples, who also appear not to have claimed sole successor-ship nor created any organization. Yet, Babuji claims to have gotten direct orders in a dream from Lalaji to establish the Shri Ram Chandra Mission (SRCM), and claim himself as Lalaji’s sole successor.This history leaves many loose ends. What is known is the series of events that proceeded as Babuji established the SRCM and began to attract very dedicated and evolved disciples into his inner circle. The most notable was the scholar Dr. Vadarachari, who died unexpectedly leaving a void in Babuji’s Inner Circle.The practice of Sahaj Marg, Babuji’s reformed Raja Yoga, devoid of any Sufi references, was intended to be accessible to householders, and was not to be associated with any specific religion. It was a method for the disciple or abhyasi (aspirant) to have direct experience with God.In the early 1980s, Babuji passed away, leaving an embattled organization behind. This spawned a series vicious legal challenges between senior disciples, fighting over who controlled the Mission. Parthasarthi Rajagopalachari (Chari), appeared to have the most credibility with his legal paperwork and legacy of accompanying Babuji on his various trips abroad, and was adept at early on establishing himself as the new President and Successor to Babuji. Splinter groups were spawned revolving around the son of Dr. Vadarachari, and Babuji’s son, Umesh among others. At the same time, competing organizations founded around Lalaji and his brother were also established.Root Cause of the Failure of SRCMYoga acknowledges the power of thought, that though focused on a thing, gives that thing power. The Yogic principles are based on the concept that creation is the result of an initial thought from the Ultimate, and that each human being a spark of the same initial thought also has their own creation spawned from their own thoughts.SRCM promotes a process of meditation on the heart, a cleaning meditation done in the evening, and a prayer done at bedtime that acknowledges the living Master as the goal of life. The intent, was that thought, redirected towards the divine within would promote a more spiritually evolved human being. While the practice is supposed to empower the disciple to experience God and Reality directly, this is done under a veil of complete and total dependence and on and obedience to a living Guru. The danger with this type of practice is that if the Guru is not truly selfless, it becomes a power based relationship that benefits the Guru more than it benefits the disciple.Core to the problem that has evolved as SRCM has progressed, is a culture that is fostered around spiritual attainment. Babuji established that a new vista of human attainment was possible through his practice, referred to as the Central Region. The resulting culture around attaining the Central Region has established a very dangerous precedent. Disciples, who are supposed to be reducing ego, are developing a self centered desire to achieve this spiritual goal and earn entry into a Brighter World at a highly evolved level in the afterlife. Exclusivity established in the SRCM culture caused disciples to believe that only through the SRCM and the support of the living Master could such high attainment be possible. This dependence on the Mission and Master promoted a competitive atmosphere where people vie for attention and favor of the Master in order to achieve their selfish spiritual goals and serve the Mission at all costs to self and family in order to gain spiritual favors. Lost in this culture, is any sense of selfless charity. All selfless actions revolve around serving the Mission and are in fact not selfless at all. The disciple assumes that their “selfless” contribution to the Mission will be rewarded with spiritual attainment and entry into the Brighter World. Clearly something is expected in return for unquestioning obedience to the Mission and Master.In fact the very principles within the Yogic traditions around realities being created by thought, have been used to create a culture of psuedo-selfless disciples, who serve a Mission and a Master, in expectation of getting something in return. A grand deception results where the disciple believes they are promoting selflessness, but in fact, are selfishly sacrificing what they can to achieve something perceived as better for themSELVES. In the end, the ego develops a new veil. While the Master blames his disciples year after year in public admonishment, about the lack of progress, in fact, the grand deception itself has created its own barrier. Disciples have been trained to selfishly strive to attain something by serving a Master and the Mission that hungrily requires new disciples yearly.SRCM has in fact created a culture that has completely deviated from the very principles that Sahaj Marg promotes. The root cause appears to be the Mission itself and a singular Master who claims sole successor-ship, without peer, and cannot be questioned. Disciples are encouraged to cease questioning the contradictions and in fact are told to ignore them as they are of this world, and it is only the next world that they should worry about.Like the Wizard of Oz, they are told to ignore the man behind the curtain and focus on the light show before them, on the Master who will grant them their selfish wish to gain entry into the Central Region and be assured access to the Brighter World upon death.Invertendo RevisitedInvertendo is a principle that has been aggressively promoted with in SRCM to explain every contradiction that one comes across in spirituality. The root of this principle comes from Lalaji’s book “Truth Eternal” where he claims that by starting from an ignorant state, we strive for knowledge, but after pursuing knowledge comes true ignorance.In my own practice I have learned that in fact we start where we end. In fact, all this attainment and lust for achievement, once exhausted, resolves back to the very point of simply being, with the love of God in one’s heart. The journey itself appears only to serve the function of wearing down of one’s ego until one returns to the ignorant state that one started the journey with, eager to be part of God’s mystery. In fact, the Path or “Marg” itself is an illusion. This explains the contradiction of the Master bowing before the beginning disciple. Perhaps it is because the innocence that exists in at the start is corrupted and lost along the path, only to be regained when one finally gives up all desire for spiritual attainment, and simply desires to be near God for God’s sake, for Love’s sake. Perhaps, all along the disciple was never very far away to begin with.This brings into question why so much focus and pressure is put on growing the numbers of disciples. If a new diciples bring their own personal power and surrender it to the Mission/Master, and provide their own thoughts to empower the Mission/Master, we have a process in which a Master can gather power and focus thoughts towards himself and his Mission to strengthen his own personal power. The most insidious concept of Invertendo could be that while by outward appearances, the diciple comes to the Mission/Master to get something, in fact the real power transfer is from the disciple to the Mission/Master.SummaryThe fundamental mistake made within the SRCM is the obsession with attaining a spiritual goal “The Central Region” rather than simply promoting “being” which in fact IS all that is left when one has achieved the elusive “Central Region” as, apparently any sense of self is all but lost and only identity or “being” remains. Sadly this fixation on attainment coupled with un-questioning obedience to a singular Mission and living Master creates the very scenario being seen in the history of the SRCM. The symptoms of this include:1. Lack of true selfless charity2. Selfish in-fighting amongst Inner Circle members of the Mission3. Struggle between Inner Circle members for control of the Mission4. Sacrifice of careers and family for the sake of the Mission5. Intolerance of debate or independent questioning of the Mission6. Intolerance of other religions - especially Christianity7. Fixation on myths rather than direct experiences.The last point is the most destructive of all as it degrades SRCM into a religion - Religion of the worst kind, one that has no checks and balances as it is controlled by an Absolute Leader who cannot be questioned. Propagation of these myths increase as tangible results from the practices fade. Myths include channeled messages from the Masters in the Brighter World, stories of Masters cavorting with the likes of Krishna and Kabir, and edicts from Masters delivered in dreams declaring the current living Master as “The Master of the Universe”.As myths replace actual experiences, disciples thoughts are deflected away from their own experiences and towards these myths, which make them their own reality. The very yogic principles of thought focused on a singular thing, giving it power, has been turned upside down to establish power in Myths that now become a reality of their own with the collective thoughts of disciples focused on them.SRCM, initially established as an organization that promotes a simple spiritual practice of God Realization that can be practiced by the common householder, has now become a power based organization using yogic principles to create a new Mythology and as a result a new religion. The question is, with all the divisions between factions, cultures and belief systems today, does the world really need yet another religion?








UPDATE FEBRUARY 24, 2007

Recent postings of letters and accusations against Chari's SRCM from the Shahjahanpur based SRCM introduced by Navneet, Babuji’s grandson, ( www.srcmshahajahanpur.org.in) has caused may questions. I'm going to attempt to address this as best I can as I am being asked to do so by several who comment regularly on my Blog. What is written below is based on facts as best I can recollect them, along with my own personal analysis and assessments of characters and underlying intentions of each character involved.

Lawsuits, Letters and Quotes from Dead People
SRCM has many divisions and factions, the two main warring factions I will refer to in this article as the Chari Clan, and the Umesh Clan. I use these terms because their behavior can easily be likened to Clan warfare.
Both clans are guilty of using the same techniques to discredit the other Clan and bolster their own credibility. Chari claims that the Umesh clan poisoned him with arsenic. Umesh produces a letter written by Babuji in Paris in 1982 claiming that Chari was poisoning Him. Both sides file legal actions against the other and produce signed, typed letters from Babuji making bold and contradictory claims. Both sides claim credibility from communications with the Dead. As an example, the Umesh Clan website quotes Lalaji from the grave claiming Babuji as Master until the end of earth ( http://www.srcmshahjahanpur.org.in/facts.html ). A quote that clearly was not made while Lalaji was alive! Chari recently had a French medium allegedly communicate with Babuji from the dead and publishes it as a book. Naturally all comments from Babuji are complementary of Chari.

This behavior has it’s source from Babuji himself. He meets Lalaji 3 times in person, then years after his death, claims in a dream to be told by Lalaji that he is a special personality and his sole successor. Babuji allegedly writes volumes upon volumes of autobiographical material claiming to have meetings with Jesus Christ, Buddha, Vivenkenanda, all transmitting to him and praising his spiritual prowess.

Why would anyone spiritually driven even bother to do these things? What is the natural result of creating an exclusive successor lineage, and an organization of passive, and subservient disciples who unquestioningly follow the orders of a single Master or his Organization?

With this smokescreen being laid out by both sides I constantly hear the following questions in various blog commentary:

1. Was Babuji Delusional?
2. Which side is telling the truth?
3. Who should one believe?
4. Are the letters authentic?

Like any good political or religious organization, these are the questions that those in power want the population to ask. It distracts from the real questions and causes one to question their opposition. I suggest we ask the following questions.


1. Why would a spiritually adept individual with humanity’s benefit in mind create such mythology around them selves?
2. If spiritual up liftment of Humanity is the goal, why would nature restrict this through only one living human being?
3. Why does a spiritual organization like the SRCM have so many factions that are fighting for control?
4. What do they desire to control that is so important that they resort to this kind of behavior?
5. If all parties agree that Babuji’s letters can be forged, why give credence to any of these documents.
6. Why is control over the Mission’s name, emblem and property so important to the warring Clans?

I don't have answers to any of these questions. I only suggest we ask the right questions and not get lost in the smokescreen. I will attempt to re-iterate what I know from my blog and add any further details I can below:

The Guru Persona
Having been a preceptor once, I directly experienced the cultural influence such a position has on people. It is the easiest thing to act holy and command the attention and reverence of others in this position. Its source does not come from the Preceptor, nor does it come from the Master, it comes from the combined attention of those who believe that a preceptor/master is a source of spiritual power. It only takes one or two non-believers to destroy the communal mindset. Gurus avoid these situations like the plague to maintain their image. Chari and Babuji were no exception to this, choosing to stay close to their inner circle where they could easily maintain their persona. I’m certain that Umesh used similar techniques. Put any of them in a Texas pool hall and watch their persona and influence diminish to nothing.

Babuji's Letters
I watched Babuji sign letters written by his close associates and handed to him for signing. I’ve also seen Babuji extremely sick and completely at the mercy of those around him. I suspect that the original letter that Chari produced was authentic ( http://www.srcmshahjahanpur.org.in/facts-fraud_nomination.html ), however, it did not claim that Chari was a spiritual Master. Simply that he would be president and representative. This however is only my opinion knowing the characters involved. Whether Chari and others exploited Babuji's condition to forge letters doesn’t really matter one bit as, clearly both Clans accuse the other of creating forgeries, then both sides are admitting that forging Babuji's letters was easily done. That is a fact we can all acknowledge since all parties involved have admitted to this fact.

Character Assessments
Chari - Chari in his disciple days made himself as visibly loyal to Babuji as possible. He inserted himself in visible ways during Babuji's trips to the West, always attending to him, always advising him, always near him. His outward appearance was very materialistic and imposing. He smoked Dunhill cigarettes, dressed extremely well, and was visibly putting him self in the public eye of westerners as a likely successor. I can only imagine how Indians resented this.

Umesh - My experience with Umesh was from knowing him and his wife for about 2 weeks while he visited the US on his "unofficial" visit to the US. Un-official because Babuji would not make it "official". This, in and of itself, is telling. He travelled with two of the more senior Preceptors in the Mission who opposed Chari. Umesh occasionally attended sittings and showed little interest in being actively involved in the activities of the organization. I definitely felt that these two Preceptors (Ragavendra Rao and Ramacandra Reddy) had brought him along to give them some sort of additional credibility and start socializing him as a possible figure head. It was obvious to everyone that Babuji would die in a few years and this appeared to me to be a direct counter to Chari's interaction with the west.

Overall Analysis is that both the Chari and Umesh clans were blatantly trying to woo the West for support. Chari's more westernized personality was far more effective than what was presented by his opposition. The other senior preceptors did not have the political skills nor the financial where with all to travel extensively with Babuji on his international trips. Umesh appeared to be their only figurehead given that, as his son, he had as much close access to Babuji as Chari. The validity of either seems immaterial to me as in both instances,it was a fight for control and power, having nothing to do with the spiritual upliftment of humanity and far more to do with gaining the favor of wealthy westerners.

Paris 1982
I attended the Paris 1982 gathering. My observation is that, at that time there were those who supported Chari and those who opposed him. Andre Poray was on the side that opposed Chari. There was no doubt in my mind that this gathering was an attempt to divert western attention away from Chari. Chari was explicitly not invited to the gathering, however, somehow, he managed to be there. I was told that this was because Babuji demanded Chari’s presence there. This may or may not be true, as Chari may simply have shown up on his own accord. Chari was in a room next to Babuji's, which adds credence to the theory that Babuji wanted him there. Members of Chari’s opposition attempted to attend to Babuji keeping Chari as far away as possible. I spent many an hour in Chari's room and witnessed Babuji's attendees sheepishly requesting Chari’s presence in Babujis room due to Babuji’s request.

I also witnessed that Babuji was sick and delirious. Attendees would drive him to the meditation hall, and carry him into the hall, this effort requiring two large men to carry out. He would black out and fall on his knees if he tried to walk. It was as if they were carrying a corpse into the hall for all to see. Any letter written by Babuji at this time in this state, is questionable, especially such a long letter as the one on the Umesh Clan website. In my opinion, any official documents signed by Babuji during this time frame has little credibility.

Chari on the other hand was also aggressively keeping himself in the public eye. He played the role of the man in exile, holding court in his small room, inviting friendly disciples to mediate with him. It was a very effective bit of drama as he knew that people like myself would see his opposition attempt to attend to Babuji in a western country, while Babuji had come accustomed to Chari serving this role. Babuji's constant calls for Chari were embarrassing I'm sure to Chari’s opposition.

As for the references to the doctor attending to Babuji. I spoke with the Doctor at length just after Babuji left. He was a German doctor who practiced both homeopathic and conventional, allopathic medicine. No mention of treachery. His story was that Babuji was far too sick to travel to the west and should never had made the trip. He felt that the trip to Paris would likely be the death of Babuji. Given that Babuji never fully recovered from this trip, his words have the most credibility of all other claims.


Fact and Fiction
Ignoring letters, legal pursuits, accusations, etc, we can at least determine the following as facts:

1. All factions agree that Babuji's letters could easily be forged
2. All factions were clearly posturing for taking over the Mission during Babuji's last days
3. Significant importance was put on developing the Mission in the West and attracting wealthy westerners
4. All factions strove to be visibly close to Babuji during his western trips in his final years


Hypothesis
Babuji created an organization that was based on power and exclusivity. In his last years he was also an extremely sick man who clearly could be manipulated by those around him as evidenced by accusations from both sides claiming the other side exploited this situation. The push for western validation was about power and money. Chari spent significant time and effort gaining a foot hold before Babuji's death, then exploited it by traveling to Europe and the US after Babuji's death, surrounding himself with wealthy disciples from the west and creating a massive library of books from his talks and speeches. He overpowered the opposition who reacted as best they could, by discrediting Chari through whatever means necessary. Both sides exploited the corrupt Indian legal system to gain control of the name and emblem.

There are plenty of examples of either side filing legal action against the other. One attempt in April of 2000, where Chari’s Clan filed a complaint against the Umesh Clan with ICANN, the internet domain registrar, protesting the use of sahajmarg.org as a domain name. The complaint was denied, however, this effort clearly demonstrates significant value being placed on the intellectual property of the Mission. (See http://www.arb-forum.com/domains/decisions/94237.htm for the decision). Need I remind everyone that the Legal profession both in the US and India, is not one of high integrity when it comes to these types of legal actions. Giving any credibility to the lawyers who represent these claims misses the point. These legal claims are attacks on the credibility of the opposition and simply the exploitation of the legal system for the purpose of gaining an upper hand in controling the Mission.

What is happening here is a power grab, and, "he who has the most disciples wins" appears to be the rule of the game. I stand by my analysis in the "Lessons In Power" article in my Blog (www.innercircleofsrcm.blogspot.com). The real power comes from the disciples, not from the Master. It is easy to sit in a chair in front of thousands of doting disciples and appear to be holy. The spiritual environment is created by the people surrounding the Master, not by the Master himself. Any truly spiritual teacher will not impose anything of him self on the student, but will push the student to find it in his or her self. This is completely lacking in the SRCM system from the beginning, and neither of the warring factions have attempted to introduce anything but centralized, power based spiritual principles to their disciples. The Sufi tradition treated the teacher as a friend, house guest or grandfather. It was about human interaction and learning by example. It was about actions in the real world, not un-substantiated communications with the Brighter World. This Sufi aspect has been completely eliminated from SRCM, leaving only a misguided concept that spirituality must come from something outside oneself, and one must find the one and only true spiritual guide in the entire world to achieve it.

I know I am repeating myself as I've already stated this in my Blog, but, the most dangerous aspect of SRCM is the creation of myths. Quoting Babuji or Lalaji from the dead, claims of inter-communication with Jesus ( who's legacy is slammed constantly by Chari and his inner circle), Buddha, etc. are easily created, and unfortunately easily believed by non-thinking, obedient members of a cult. All factions are using this technique to give themselves credibility. How hard would it be to create such myths and get obedient, unquestioning cult members to believe them? Anyone can produce a letter signed by Babuji, and invent a quote from Lalaji or Babuji from the brigher world, or claim intercommunication with Krishna or Jesus. Sadly, we have seen that the cult mentality will have throngs of individuals believing these claims without question.The actions of all those involved in all factions of this organization is embarrassingly materialistic, power seeking, and not the behavior of anyone even remotely interested in spirituality and God. There is little point in weeding through these claims to determine the truth. There’s plenty of deception, lies, and selfishness from both Clans. Its the equivalent of choosing which street gang has the least negative impact on the neighborhood, or whether the Hitler or Mussolini was the better man. There is a battle for control of the minds and souls of an extremely wealthy and subservient group of individuals. Beyond that, the true facts are vague and irrelevant. One only needs ignore the words, documents, legal filings and quotes from dead people, and examine the actions of these individuals to see the truth –and the truth will indeed set you free.

Michael


Témoignage publié en 2006 sur le website de Michael